Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley <andrew29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:29:06 -0000
Andrew Haley <andrew29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
every assignment creates a separate temporary variable.
Just to follow up on my own posting, I realized afterwards that I was
being slightly simplistic, to the point of misleading. Before code
generation, gcc converts out of SSA back into standard form, and this
can result in the separate SSA variables being coalesced back into a
single temporary variable.
Andrew.
.
- References:
- Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Anton Ertl
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Anton Ertl
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Anton Ertl
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Anton Ertl
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Anton Ertl
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Bernd Paysan
- Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- From: Andrew Haley
- Gforth and gcc "progress"
- Prev by Date: Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- Next by Date: Re: Build your own Forth for Microchip PIC: Design thoughts
- Previous by thread: Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- Next by thread: Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- Index(es):