Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- From: Frank Buss <fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:46:58 +0200
Elizabeth D Rather wrote:
pettitj@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://www.physorg.com/news102087207.html
They are: http://www.intellasys.net/index.php
It is parallel, but has a very different concept. Every core of the
IntellaSys SEAforth chip has its own RAM and ROM, but the CPU from Vishkin
uses the PRAM concept. See
http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/users/vishkin/XMT/spaa07paper.pdf for a more
detailed description and the Wikipedia article about PRAM:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRAM (I'm sorry, the German article is more
detailed than the English article).
A very interesting concept of the SEAforth chip is that it is fully
asynchonous. I assume they are using something like dual-rail signalling or
the Muller C gate for implementing this design.
--
Frank Buss, fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- From: Bernd Paysan
- Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- References:
- Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- From: pettitj
- Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- From: Elizabeth D Rather
- Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- Prev by Date: Re: Gforth and gcc "progress"
- Next by Date: Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- Next by thread: Re: Why aren't the forth people doing this?
- Index(es):