Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:28:13 -0600
rickman wrote:
On Apr 3, 7:10 pm, John Passaniti <n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:rickman wrote:I don't buy into the idea that an algorithm can't be factored. If itThat's silly. An algorithm's ability to be factored has no relationship
can't be factored, then it must be so small that it is not needed.
on if the application needs that algorithm.
I didn't mean the algorithm is not needed, I mean the factoring is not
needed.
Only if you don't care that the code is write-only.
--
John Doty, Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
--
Specialization is for robots.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: rickman
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- References:
- Forth Frustrations
- From: George Peter Staplin
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: Andreas Kochenburger
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: John Doty
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: Andreas Kochenburger
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: J Thomas
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: rickman
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: John Passaniti
- Re: Forth Frustrations
- From: rickman
- Forth Frustrations
- Prev by Date: Re: Forth Frustrations
- Next by Date: Re: Forth Frustrations
- Previous by thread: Re: Forth Frustrations
- Next by thread: Re: Forth Frustrations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading