Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- From: "Jean-François Michaud" <cometaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Sep 2006 13:45:54 -0700
werty wrote:
These Forth Words people have trouble with ........
All missing in NewForth , no ALLOCATE , no STATE , no [Compile time]
no IMMEDIATE ...... all transparent , no need to work at that low
level .
Oh ? you did not know you could quickly work at a higher level ?
Yes ! Thats what makes Forth different , in 5 minutes you are
assembling
code at high level ! Using a GUI !
Free OpSys for PDAs ...... Join Now and save $45 ..... kidding .
LOL. Oh my god, I can't stop laughing. I think somebody got dropped on
their head as a child. "But how can somebody drop me on my head will he
say".
Good times.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- From: ziggy
- Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- From: werty
- Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- References:
- 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- From: werty
- 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- Prev by Date: __NEWBE QUESTION : Dictionary organization
- Next by Date: Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- Previous by thread: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- Next by thread: Re: 99% of this OLD FORTH is bogus !
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|