comp.lang.forth

• Thread Index

---

• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Lang-X Source Code
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Lang-X Source Code
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Tcykgreis
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Lang-X Source Code
  • From: anoneds@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: werty
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Web Radio and Webcasts
  • From: Howerd Oakford
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Neal Bridges
• RfD: Front Matter (long)
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: wincon.dll 64-bit
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: wincon.dll 64-bit
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: wincon.dll 64-bit
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• 32-bit CRC table generation at compile time in C, was Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD - 2VALUE
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: astrobe
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: wincon.dll 64-bit
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - 2VALUE
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: vandyswa
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess (Andrew Haley)
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - 2VALUE
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: 2VALUE
  • From: GerryJ
• RfD - 2VALUE
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Axel Harvey
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Stefan Schmiedl
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Case sensitivity
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Case sensitivity
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Signed 64/64 division is faster than unsigned division?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Signed 64/64 division is faster than unsigned division?
  • From: werty
• Re: 2VALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: NORAD SGP4/SDP4
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: 2VALUE
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• The IMMEDIATE mess
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Compilation wordlist (was: RfD: SYNONYM)
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: 2VALUE
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: 2VALUE
  • From: dbu
• 2VALUE
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Compilation wordlist (was: RfD: SYNONYM)
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: NORAD SGP4/SDP4
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: wincon.dll 64-bit
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: NORAD SGP4/SDP4
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• wincon.dll 64-bit
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Peter Fälth
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD: Second attempt at Structures
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: NORAD SGP4/SDP4
  • From: Stefan Schmiedl
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Signed 64/64 division is faster than unsigned division?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - SYNONYM
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: mlideen
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: NORAD SGP4/SDP4
  • From: John Doty
• NORAD SGP4/SDP4
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD: Second attempt at Structures
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - THROW codes and Iors
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD - THROW codes and Iors
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - THROW codes and Iors
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: dbu
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: Compilation wordlist (was: RfD: SYNONYM)
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Compilation wordlist (was: RfD: SYNONYM)
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: werty
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Compilation wordlist (was: RfD: SYNONYM)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Anton Ertl
• RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - FVALUE
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Software ideology versus pragmatism
  • From: John Doty
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• where's the ANS code? (was Re: Project proposal -- Forth project) organiser
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: RfD - THROW codes and Iors
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - THROW codes and Iors
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Double division
  • From: Brad Eckert
• INCLUDE and file paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: BSD licence CPU Design (fpga OFSIP Core)
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - THROW codes and Iors
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Double division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: Double division
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Double division
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: Double division
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Double division
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: What is the licensing status of Fig-Forth v 2.32? Are Forth compilers generally safe?
  • From: m-coughlin
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RetroForth ANS Layer now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: RetroForth ANS Layer now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• RetroForth ANS Layer now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Ed
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Double division
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Compiler Design Books; Formerly: Trees
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: File paths
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: File paths
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: CfV: Separate FP Stack
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: CfV: EKEY return values for some keyboard events
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Double division
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: CfV: EKEY return values for some keyboard events
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Current Standings: EKEY return values for some keyboard events
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Current Standings: CfV: Separate FP Stack
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Double division
  • From: Andrew Haley
• FSL news
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: Double division
  • From: jacko
• Re: Double division
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: George Hubert
• Double division
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: BSD licence CPU Design
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• String manipulation (was Re: RfD - Escaped Strings )
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: SYNONYM
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: Structures
  • From: jacko
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• OFF-TOPIC: iForth Linux and sound
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: werty
• RfD: Structures
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: jacko
• Re: SYNONYM
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: SYNONYM
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: SYNONYM
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: billy
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• RfD: SYNONYM
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• RfD - Escaped Strings (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD - Enhanced local variable syntax (long)
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Don Seglio
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: volksForth 3.80.1 6502 for C64, C16 and Plus 4 re-release
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: volksForth 3.80.1 6502 for C64, C16 and Plus 4 re-release
  • From: Carsten Strotmann
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: BSD licence Open Hardware Proc Spec Ver C (Request Comment)
  • From: jacko
• BSD licence Open Hardware Proc Spec Ver C (Request Comment)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Open Hardware Proc Spec Ver C (Request Comment)
  • From: jacko
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Ed
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: rickman
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: rickman
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: rickman
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Jupiter Ace Archive ste updates
  • From: morrigancp
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: Open Hardware Proc Spec Ver C (Request Comment)
  • From: jacko
• Re: NEW - FlashForth
  • From: Mikael
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jrh
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Ed
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: dkelvey
• Re: NEW - FlashForth
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: NEW - FlashForth
  • From: Mikael
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: NEW - FlashForth
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• looking for cash paying job
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Searching for ancient clf post [BOM related]
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: Searching for ancient clf post [BOM related]
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• NEW - FlashForth
  • From: Mikael
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: a new blocks and buffers paradigm
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: George Hubert
• a new blocks and buffers paradigm
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Open Hardware Proc Spec Ver C (Request Comment)
  • From: jacko
• Re: THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Searching for ancient clf post [BOM related]
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• THEN instaid of ENDIF
  • From: Tessa Celine Bonting
• Re: Searching for ancient clf post [BOM related]
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Searching for ancient clf post [BOM related]
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Alex McDonald
• LSE64 - An example
  • From: John Doty
• LSE64 - reference
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• WANT and INDEX
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• REQUIRE NEEDS WANT and INDEX
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: REQUIRE and INDEX for blocks
  • From: jacko
• Re: REQUIRE and INDEX for blocks
  • From: jacko
• REQUIRE and INDEX for blocks
  • From: jacko
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: New :REDa4 incomplete version
  • From: jacko
• Re: 2nd Generation Stack CPU
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• New :REDa4 incomplete version
  • From: pablo reda
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Open Hardware Proc Spec Ver C (Request Comment)
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: ALLOCATE and FREE ambiguous conditions
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: J Thomas
• Work schedule
  • From: bills@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: mark4
• Re: 2nd Generation Stack CPU
  • From: Carsten Strotmann
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• 2nd Generation Stack CPU
  • From: ziggy
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: i think implict BUFFER treatment of the dictionary sections is crutial to forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Output under win32forth turnkey
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Output under win32forth turnkey
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Output under win32forth turnkey
  • From: Rod Oakford
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Jeff Fox
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Gforth and Unix signal handling
  • From: Robert Swan
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Output under win32forth turnkey
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: Output under win32forth turnkey
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: i think implict BUFFER treatment of the dictionary sections is crutial to forth
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Output under win32forth turnkey
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: i think implict BUFFER treatment of the dictionary sections is crutial to forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: i think implict BUFFER treatment of the dictionary sections is crutial to forth
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: i think implict BUFFER treatment of the dictionary sections is crutial to forth
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• i think implict BUFFER treatment of the dictionary sections is crutial to forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Doty
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Bill Spight
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Trouble with canceling my subscription please help!
  • From: Bill McCarthy
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Trouble with canceling my subscription please help!
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Julian Noble's secret life
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: benchmark on rewrited pde1.frt
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: jacko
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• benchmark on rewrited pde1.frt
  • From: humptydumpty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: billy
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: Julian Noble's secret life
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: What is Forth?
  • From: billy
• Re: Trouble with canceling my subscription please help!
  • From: Bill Marcum
• Re: Trouble with canceling my subscription please help!
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Reflections on good and evil
  • From: gacrux3000
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Trouble with canceling my subscription please help!
  • From: japeters
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: rickman
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• ANN: SwiftForth 3.0 released
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: rickman
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: rickman
• Julian Noble's secret life
  • From: Michael Park
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Gary Bergstrom
• ColdFire MCF5213 Evaluation Kit
  • From: Chris Stephens
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: George Hubert
• Reva FORTH based 4th.CoSy APL to be @ APL-moot, Hampshire, UK Aug 18-20
  • From: Bob Armstrong
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Forth fibonacci shootout
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: New FORTH project commited to freshmeat.net
  • From: Luca Masini
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: casioculture
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: casioculture
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Peter Lawrence
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Gary Bergstrom
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Roger Ivie
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: jacko
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Ed Coombs
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Newbie Question: Division by multiplication?
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: Advice on good forth coding
  • From: rickman
• Re: How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Advice on good forth coding
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• How does Require deal with multiple files of the same name in different directories
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Advice on good forth coding
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Testing portable code
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Advice on good forth coding
  • From: rickman
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Catch...Throw and Multitasking
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: Advice on good forth coding
  • From: werty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: werty
• Re: Forth Dimensions, Embedded Systems Programming, Dr. Dobb's
  • From: Stefan Schmiedl
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: coordinate problem
  • From: Colin MacIntyre
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: coordinate problem
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: Trees
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: coordinate problem
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Mark Carter
• Looking for a System Designer for Technical Specification Drafting
  • From: spartak77
• Looking for a System Designer for Technical Specification Drafting
  • From: spartak77
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• coordinate problem
  • From: Colin MacIntyre
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Roger Ivie
• How to write a FORTH in BASIC
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Stephen J. Bevan
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Forth Dimensions, Embedded Systems Programming, Dr. Dobb's
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Noob: Creating (create)
  • From: Mark Carter
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Catch...Throw and Multitasking
  • From: werty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: dbu
• Re: Catch...Throw and Multitasking
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Catch...Throw and Multitasking
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Catch...Throw and Multitasking
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Forth Dimensions, Embedded Systems Programming, Dr. Dobb's
  • From: Clever Monkey
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Stefan Schmiedl
• Catch...Throw and Multitasking
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Classifying Forth
  • From: Ed
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: rickman
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Compiler Design Books; Formerly: Trees
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Compiler Design Books; Formerly: Trees
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Compiler Design Books; Formerly: Trees
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Which Forth should I use?
  • From: Nuclear Fusion
• Re: Trees
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Trees
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: rickman
• Re: Trees
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Trees
  • From: Reinhold Straub
• Re: Trees
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Trees
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Trees
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Problem compiling pfe-0.9.14
  • From: Tarkin
• Re: Trees
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Trees
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Trees
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Trees
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Trees
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Trees
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Trees
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Trees
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Trees
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Trees
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: Order of the Stick cryptograms.
  • From: Julian Fondren
• Re: Order of the Stick cryptograms.
  • From: Julian Fondren
• Re: Order of the Stick cryptograms.
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Order of the Stick cryptograms.
  • From: J Thomas
• Trees
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Order of the Stick cryptograms.
  • From: ayrnieu@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: J Thomas
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Truth
  • From: mlideen
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Debug Bug in the latest version of ficl 4.0.31 or maby i have made something wrong
  • From: richardd
• Re: Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: George Hubert
• Ok, I give up, can anyone define :THIS?
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: JFAR
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: JFAR
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Forth 200x Standards Meeting
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• EuroForth 2006 Conference Registration
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: JFAR
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: rickman
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: werty
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: werty
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: werty
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: werty
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: werty
• C-based Forths ?
  • From: werty
• Re: ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Classifying Forth
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Ed
• Bother checking wether got response of your topic?
  • From: hotting
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Jerry Avins
• ICFP Contest - Sandmark in VFX
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Forth Metrics (was Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths)
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: John Passaniti
• daily billable hours
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• ftp.forth.org - gone?
  • From: Ed
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Ed
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: Bytecode
  • From: Charles Turner
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: George Hubert
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: ben yates
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Project proposal -- Forth project organiser
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: oninoshikoATgmailDOTcom
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: How "scalable" is forth?
  • From: Mark Probert
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: File paths
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: File paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: File paths
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: File paths
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: File paths
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• SLOC analysis on C-based Forths
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: File paths
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Ed
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• isforth-1.20 released
  • From: mark4
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: John Doty
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Is ICFP "non-Funtional" was []Re: ICFP Contest]
  • From: John Passaniti
• can this be improved on ?
  • From: mark4
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Is ICFP "non-Funtional" was []Re: ICFP Contest]
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Is ICFP "non-Funtional" was []Re: ICFP Contest]
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Is ICFP "non-Funtional" was []Re: ICFP Contest]
  • From: Richard Owlett
• File paths
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: ICFP Contest
  • From: jmdrake_98
• ICFP Contest
  • From: Dennis Ruffer
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Open hardware microprocessor specification RFC
  • From: jacko
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: Aleksej Saushev
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Guze
• Re: CfV: Separate FP Stack
  • From: Ed
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: Mark W. Humphries
• Re: Problem compiling pfe-0.9.14
  • From: Tarkin
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Guze
• isforth-1.19b released
  • From: mark4
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What languages do you regularly use besides forth?
  • From: John Doty
• Re: Newbie Question: dictionary organization?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: GerryJ
• [FURTHER OT ;] what is "temporary" and other engineering questions was once[Re: History: How did Forth get its stacks?]
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Problem compiling pfe-0.9.14
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: rickman
• Problem compiling pfe-0.9.14
  • From: Tarkin
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: ayrnieu@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: GerryJ
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: jacko
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: jmdrake_98
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Newbie Question: dictionary organization?
  • From: j2thomas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Future Width Forth
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Newbie Question: dictionary organization?
  • From: Charles Turner
• isforth 1.18b released
  • From: mark4
• Re: Future Width Forth
  • From: mark4
• Re: SEAforth Instruction Set
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: CfV: Separate FP Stack
  • From: Mike Hore
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: OT Advice on good forth coding
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: How does forth' productivity compare to the scripting languages?
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: using MISC (post 1987 Forth hardware) opcodes
  • From: Ed

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)