Re: RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- From: "Doug Hoffman" <dhoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2006 01:37:56 -0700
Andrew Haley wrote:
There were two: one mis-formatted one, posted as
1150704598.962101.98230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and one correct
one, 1150723476.023530.252860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes. I posted the second "readable" version after reading your post.
Thanks for pointing out the formatting problem. I normally use my
programming text editor for creating posts. It places a hard return at
the end of each line. So if the lines are too long, which they were,
things can get ugly.
Regards,
-Doug
.
- References:
- RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- From: Doug Hoffman
- Re: RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- From: Andrew Haley
- Re: RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- From: Torborn Rocasein
- Re: RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- From: Andrew Haley
- RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- Prev by Date: SEAforth Instruction Set
- Next by Date: Re: RfD - Object Extensions
- Previous by thread: Re: RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- Next by thread: RfD - Object Extensions, Additional Information (Long)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|