comp.lang.forth

• Thread Index

---

• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Code compaction (Was: What is the most compact TTC scheme?)
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: MPE website
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Rational trigonometry
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Rational trigonometry
  • From: BR
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Rational trigonometry
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Rational trigonometry
  • From: Paul E. Bennett
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Rational trigonometry
  • From: Marc Olschok
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• OT: Good Fortune
  • From: R A Lynn
• Re: Code compaction (Was: What is the most compact TTC scheme?)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Code compaction (Was: What is the most compact TTC scheme?)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: What about case sensetivity in Standard ?
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Strings in ANS'94 not real FORTH strings
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Strings in ANS'94 not real FORTH strings
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: What about case sensetivity in Standard ?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: John Passaniti
• Rational trigonometry
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: John Rible
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Strings in ANS'94 not real FORTH strings
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: R A Lynn
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Using full-futured FORTH system or cross-compiling to byte-code
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Dave Huseby
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Andy Valencia
• kForth critical update
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Using full-futured FORTH system or cross-compiling to byte-code
  • From: astrobe
• Re: Using full-futured FORTH system or cross-compiling to byte-code
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: astrobe
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Using full-futured FORTH system or cross-compiling to byte-code
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: What about case sensetivity in Standard ?
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: What about case sensetivity in Standard ?
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What about case sensetivity in Standard ?
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Re: The ANSI standard
  • From: Peter Knaggs
• Strings in ANS'94 not real FORTH strings
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• What about case sensetivity in Standard ?
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Using full-futured FORTH system or cross-compiling to byte-code
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Dmitry Ponyatov
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• a tutorial on bootstrapping forth?
  • From: Dave Huseby
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Advice saught
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Advice saught
  • From: R A Lynn
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• EuroForth 2005 Call for papers and participation
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Joseph Frippiat
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• RfD: XCHAR wordset (for UTF-8 and alike)
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Peter Lawrence
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Alasdair
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Alasdair
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Adam H
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bill Marcum
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: astrobe
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: astrobe
• Re: miscutil
  • From: Alasdair
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: Andreas Kochenburger
• RfC: [DEFINED] and [UNDEFINED]
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: miscutil
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Anton Ertl
• miscutil
  • From: Alasdair
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Doug Hoffman
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bill Marcum
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: jerry gitomer
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: astrobe
• Re: What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: astrobe
• What would be people's ideas on a Forth spreadsheet
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Bruce McFarling
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Two control stacks - was Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Leaving BEGIN/REPEAT
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Rod Oakford
• Re: Two control stacks - was Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Removing ANS restrictions - the White Knight's problom
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: DEFINED
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• DEFINED (was: Bug in complex-test.fs)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• reference implementation (was: VARIABLE)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: C. G. Montgomery
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Charles Melice
• proposed additions to FSL-UTIL
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Gary Chanson
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Ultraedit Forth syntax files
  • From: Russell Willis
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Red Minnesota, ..
  • From: anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Red Minnesota, ...
  • From: Reply7471859353
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: Two control stacks - was Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Neal Bridges
• VARIABLE (was is VARIABLE does ? )
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Two control stacks - was Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Robert Spykerman
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Judges1318
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: Joachim Merkel
• Re: forth + gnustep binding.(long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• New programs
  • From: Jos van de Ven
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: forth + gnustep binding.(long)
  • From: dobest03
• DO/LEAVE/LOOP implementation
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Andrew Haley
• is VARIABLE does ?
  • From: Charles Melice
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Judges1318
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Rod Oakford
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: forth + gnustep binding.(long)
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: John Passaniti
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: forth + gnustep binding.(long)
  • From: dobest03
• Re: forth + gnustep binding.(long)
  • From: dobest03
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Calling DLLs
  • From: Geoff Turner
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Wolfgang Allinger
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Maki
• Re: Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Standard Forth reference card now available
  • From: Neal Bridges
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Forth Day 2005
  • From: jv
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Calling DLLs
  • From: dbu
• Re: Calling DLLs
  • From: georgeahubert
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: BR
• Calling DLLs
  • From: Geoff Turner
• Fact or Fiction, real optical notebook computer?
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Wayne
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: Reply7471859353
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Forth as a VM/Implementation-language for oher languages.
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: John Passaniti
• A computer chip for stupid me and other ignorant people ...
  • From: Reply7471859353
• Re: An ignorant regret,
  • From: Reply7471859353
• An ignorant regret,
  • From: Reply7471859353
• Re: Sunrise/Sunset Algorithm
  • From: The Beez'
• My 0.02p's worth
  • From: Pinback
• Re: Sunrise/Sunset Algorithm
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: rounding FP to u significant digits
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Maki
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: The Beez'
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: Trey Boudreau
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Maki
• Re: rounding FP to u significant digits
  • From: Ed
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Bernd Paysan
• Re: Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: Wayne
• Re: Any iForth user ?
  • From: Joseph Frippiat
• attn: lacey - genuinely pleasing - niy wuw ef ettu - (1/1)
  • From: bing
• Magnetomemory/Magnetologic and Forth
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: STC within an ITC environment
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Joseph Frippiat
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Anton Ertl
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: robert spykerman
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: jzakiya
• Re: Not so good newbie wannabe programmer needing help
  • From: Pinback
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: Coos Haak
• Bug in complex-test.fs
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• rounding FP to u significant digits
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Robert Spykerman
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: FSL cubic equation solver
  • From: Krishna Myneni
• Re: Code compaction
  • From: ward mcfarland
• Re: Denver baggage handling
  • From: Brad Eckert
• Re: Code compaction (Was: What is the most compact TTC scheme?)
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Bugs in Minforth
  • From: Ed
• REPRESENT revisited
  • From: Ed
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: robert spykerman
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: robert spykerman
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Code compaction (Was: What is the most compact TTC scheme?)
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• Re: What is the most compact TTC scheme?
  • From: Bill Muench
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: robert spykerman
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: robert spykerman
• Re: ANS Forth - was Denver baggage handling
  • From: Howerd
• Re: Not so good newbie wannabe programmer needing help
  • From: Howerd
• Re: Sudoku puzzle solver
  • From: Marcel Hendrix
• Re: More newbie Pentium/Forth tricks...
  • From: Robert Spykerman
• Re: What is the most compact TTC scheme?
  • From: Elizabeth D Rather
• Re: Data stack 'frame' superior
  • From: bobjaffray@xxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the most compact TTC scheme?
  • From: Jeff M.
• Re: ANS Forth - was Denver baggage handling
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: pentomino program revisited
  • From: Albert van der Horst

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.lang.forth  > 2005-09