Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- From: klas.engwall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Klas Engwall)
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:46:50 GMT
jmilovic,
>1. The slowness i am having is that when opening some dbf, and yes when
>seeking, reading, writing... I tryed copying a local copy of exe file
>but that doesnt help, maybe a little when loading exe.
>Cpu usage is 1-5% (i use oslib)
>
>2. I had the problem on "server" when i used mapped drive, now with
>subst-ed drive works fine.
Hmmm, it sounds like there is something wrong with how the network is
set up on the "server" and that the Clipper app is just the victim of
something going on deeper down in XP. Look at drivers and protocols
for example. Is there anything you don't need that can be turned off?
Any extra protocols besides TCP/IP? And check if the performance is
identical if you let one of the workstations take the role of server
(with mapping vs substing locally and mapping over the network).
What happens if you copy a large collection of files to the C: drive
from a mapped drive and from a substed drive respectively using the
command line or Explorer? Any difference there?
IIRC there was a change introduced in XP SP2 that affected write
performance, but I can't remember the exact details and I haven't
personally seen that problem. Perhaps someone else can jump in.
You might also want to take a look at Nick Ramsay's networking page at
http://www.witzendcs.co.uk/html/nt_networking.html
The registry settings affected by Nick's reg files are not primarily
speed related, but they are considered "required" for systems where
Clipper applications and similar file sharing apps are run. So it is
generally a good idea to apply them. They _do_ solve som other common
problems.
Regards,
Klas
-------
klas dot engwall at engwall dot com
http://www.engwall.com/clipper/
The LFN Library for Clipper
The LanMan Library for Clipper
The NFPAT1A Timeslice release patch for the Nanforum Toolkit
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- From: Detlef Leonhardt
- Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- References:
- XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- From: jmilovic
- Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- From: Klas Engwall
- Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- From: jmilovic
- XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- Prev by Date: Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- Next by Date: Clipper and Canon IP 3000
- Previous by thread: Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- Next by thread: Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|