Re: listview1

Mike Williams <gagamomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>'s wild thoughts were
released on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:45:42 -0700 (PDT) bearing
the following fruit:

On 23 Jun, 19:10, "nicnat" <a...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I will do that!  However, I only have the name
of the group to go by and "basic.visual" doesn't
exactly say VB6.  Thanks though.

Yes it does! Are you stupid? "basic.visual" is just about as close as
you can get to "Visual Basic", of which the last and final version was
VB6! It's dead easy! What is it that you don't understand?

Anything else that Micro$oft later produced and that is not in any way
compatible with the real Visual basic and that Micro$haft dishonestly
called "vb.net" or "visual basic.net" or whatever is a lie and is a
deliberately dishonest marketing scam!

Dotnet (or vb.net or whatever they are calling it these days) is NOT
real Visual Basic, any more than a tin of "Heinz Baked Beans" would be
a real tin of "Heinz Baked Beans" if it contained pork belly and pig's
ears! The fact that a company owns a specific trademark does NOT give
it the right to use that trademark to dishonestly describe their
goods! Sadly though, Micro$oft have already purchased most of the
American legislature and so they need have no worries on that score!

Dotnet or vb.net or whatever is currently called is NOT Visual basic,
end of story! So you can cut the cocky attitude, boy!

Mike

Too much whisky or too little?

;-)


--
Jan Hyde

https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Jan.Hyde
.

Loading