Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: "Dag Sunde" <dag@xxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Feb 2006 10:13:50 +0100
"---Pete---" <hthXXXX@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:440150c4.112191671@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:16:14 +1100, fajp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Frank
Adam) wrote:
Must say, most people i know have made a switch of sorts, although not-----
necessarily abandoning VB. This switch however, is often not to .Net.
Java is thriving.
Good point, Frank.
I was checking around looking at the options.
My main interest is in producing applications quickly that can
be distributed as an executable. Main options seem to be VB6,
VB .NET, Delphi basic and Liberty Basic. Correct me if I'm
wrong, but Java is not compiled to a *.exe, is it?
No it isn't, but you can use a tool to wrap you app into one.
(It will still be bytecode running on the JVM, though)
--
Dag.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: Ken-Jin
- Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- References:
- What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: ---Pete---
- Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: Steve Gerrard
- Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: ---Pete---
- Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: Frank Adam
- Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- From: ---Pete---
- What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- Next by Date: Re: Msgbox limited to 1024 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- Next by thread: Re: What is the status of VB6 & DOT.NET ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|