Re: Assembler Macros
- From: spambait@xxxxxxxxxx (Doug Miller)
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:36:45 GMT
In article <kkqu7356m4r3ffd9n2njsr0llf8cigv6ff@xxxxxxx>, Binyamin Dissen <postingid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The purpose of STCM was not to do an unaligned store. It was to allow a
selective store of certain bytes in a register.
Yes, of course. The ability to do an unaligned store is a side effect.
Possibly an unintended side effect, but nonetheless a beneficial one.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: Andy Wood
- Re: Assembler Macros
- References:
- Assembler Macros
- From: Karan
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: SkippyPB
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: Steve Myers
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: SkippyPB
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: Steve Myers
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: John Small
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: Sven Pran
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: John W. Kennedy
- Re: Assembler Macros
- From: Binyamin Dissen
- Assembler Macros
- Prev by Date: Re: Assembler Macros
- Next by Date: Re: Assembler Macros
- Previous by thread: Re: Assembler Macros
- Next by thread: Re: Assembler Macros
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|