comp.lang.apl

• Date Index

---

• XQuery and Arrays, tom7777777
• testttt, Don Kelly
• test, Don Kelly
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • TEST, Don Kelly
• Re: Yale APL Idiom List, Roger
  • Re: Yale APL Idiom List, leec
• google appengine, Gosi
  • Re: google appengine, Morten Kromberg
    • Re: google appengine, Gosi
• About polynomials, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• unicode test - looking for help, graham
  • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
    • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, kaithomasmax
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Bob Smith
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
  • Re: unicode test - looking for help, phil chastney
    • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, phil chastney
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Phil Last
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
    • Re: unicode test - looking for help, kaithomasmax
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, phil chastney
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Phil Last
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, graham
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, kaithomasmax
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Phil Last
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, kaithomasmax
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Jan Karman
      • Re: unicode test - looking for help, Dick Bowman
• APL for kids, halfei
  • Re: APL for kids, Dick Bowman
  • Re: APL for kids, Gosi
  • Re: APL for kids, llund
  • Re: APL for kids, Morten Kromberg
  • Re: APL for kids, leec
    • Re: APL for kids, halfei
      • Re: APL for kids, Gosi
• looking for help, Gilbert Giappesi
  • Re: looking for help, James J. Weinkam
    • Re: looking for help, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: looking for help, Gilbert Giappesi
      • Re: looking for help, Gilbert Giappesi
      • Re: looking for help, graham
      • Message not available
      • Re: looking for help, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: looking for help, graham
      • Re: looking for help, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: looking for help, Phil Last
      • Re: looking for help, Gosi
      • Re: looking for help, graham
      • Re: looking for help, Gosi
      • Re: looking for help, graham
      • Message not available
      • Re: looking for help, graham
      • Re: looking for help, Gilbert Giappesi
  • Re: looking for help, graham
    • Re: looking for help, Gilbert Giappesi
      • Re: looking for help, graham
      • Re: looking for help, Gilbert Giappesi
• Configuring Browser for Unicode, kaithomasmax
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Configuring Browser for Unicode, Nelson Valverde
• Inquisitive computing, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: Inquisitive computing, phil chastney
    • Re: Inquisitive computing, Ibeam2000
• Frankly finding Fortis, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Quickly correlating Kendall, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• If programming langauges were religions, Ibeam2000
  • Re: If programming langauges were religions, Jan Karman
    • Re: If programming langauges were religions, Gosi
  • Re: If programming langauges were religions, Charles Richmond
    • Re: If programming langauges were religions, phil chastney
• Best way to do this?, pineapple
  • Re: Best way to do this?, Paul Houle
• asus eee, Gosi
• APL wiki, kaithomasmax
  • Message not available
    • Re: APL wiki, kaithomasmax
      • Message not available
      • Re: APL wiki, Phil Last
      • Re: APL wiki, kaithomasmax
  • Message not available
    • Re: APL wiki, kaithomasmax
      • Re: APL wiki, graham
      • Re: APL wiki, kaithomasmax
• APL Characters, kaithomasmax
  • Re: APL Characters, Gosi
    • Re: APL Characters, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: APL Characters, Gosi
      • Re: APL Characters, kaithomasmax
      • Re: APL Characters, kaithomasmax
      • Re: APL Characters, phil chastney
      • Re: APL Characters, microapl
      • Re: APL Characters, kaithomasmax
      • Re: APL Characters, Phil Last
      • Re: APL Characters, kaithomasmax
      • Re: APL Characters, Phil Last
      • Re: APL Characters, phil chastney
• Does sorting improve searching?, pineapple
  • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, pineapple
  • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, Ibeam2000
    • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, RHui000
      • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, Rav
      • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, RHui000
      • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, RHui000
      • Re: Does sorting improve searching?, Rav
• Ugliness, pineapple
  • Re: Ugliness, James J. Weinkam
    • Re: Ugliness, pineapple
      • Re: Ugliness, pineapple
      • Re: Ugliness, Morten Kromberg
      • Re: Ugliness, pineapple
      • Re: Ugliness, Ibeam2000
      • Re: Ugliness, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: Ugliness, kaithomasmax
      • Re: Ugliness, pineapple
      • Re: Ugliness, kaithomasmax
      • Re: Ugliness, Phil Last
      • Re: Ugliness, Dick Bowman
      • Re: Ugliness, Jan Karman
      • Re: Ugliness, Don Kelly
      • Re: Ugliness, Jan Karman
      • Re: Ugliness, phil chastney
      • Re: Ugliness, Martin Neitzel
• Curve it like Cauchy, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Getting Started with Dyalog?, braver
  • Re: Getting Started with Dyalog?, pineapple
  • Re: Getting Started with Dyalog?, Dick Bowman
    • Re: Getting Started with Dyalog?, Ibeam2000
• Just posted at Vector, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: Just posted at Vector, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• OT: some Unicode characters, phil chastney
• How the heck to customize the keyboard?, pineapple
  • Message not available
    • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, Morten Kromberg
      • Message not available
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, Morten Kromberg
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, pineapple
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, graham
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, pineapple
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, Bakul Shah
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, graham
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, pineapple
      • Message not available
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, phil chastney
      • Re: How the heck to customize the keyboard?, Simon Marsden
• Rare occurrence ... an APL job, apl68000
  • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, phil chastney
    • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, Jan Karman
  • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, Jan Karman
    • Message not available
      • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, apl68000
    • Message not available
      • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, pineapple
      • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: Rare occurrence ... an APL job, kaithomasmax
• The Childcare Company wins NMT award with its APL system, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• atomic vector, Jan Karman
  • Re: atomic vector, kai
    • Re: atomic vector, Morten Kromberg
    • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
      • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
  • Re: atomic vector, David Liebtag
    • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
      • Re: atomic vector, kai
      • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
      • Re: atomic vector, kai
      • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
      • Re: atomic vector, phil chastney
      • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
      • Re: atomic vector, phil chastney
    • Re: atomic vector, Jan Karman
• Dealing poker hands, pineapple
  • Re: Dealing poker hands, RHui000
    • Re: Dealing poker hands, pineapple
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, RHui000
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, David Liebtag
    • Re: Dealing poker hands, RHui000
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, pineapple
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, RHui000
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, Bakul Shah
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, pineapple
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, Bakul Shah
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, Phil Last
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, Phil Last
      • Re: Dealing poker hands, Jane Sullivan
• J vs kx/Q vs APL, braver
  • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Jan Karman
  • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, pineapple
    • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Gosi
      • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, pineapple
      • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Paul Houle
      • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Gosi
  • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Gosi
    • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Ibeam2000
  • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Stevan Apter
  • Re: J vs kx/Q vs APL, Jan Karman
• Re: Conditionals in APL?, Phil Last
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Conditionals in APL?, Paul Mansour
    • Re: Conditionals in APL?, Phil Last
  • Re: Conditionals in APL?, Don Kelly
• Spice for Beginners, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Bizarre Dyalog behavior?, pineapple
  • Re: Bizarre Dyalog behavior?, Morten Kromberg
    • Re: Bizarre Dyalog behavior?, pineapple
      • Re: Bizarre Dyalog behavior?, del
• APL Coding Style, kai
  • Re: APL Coding Style, Phil Last
    • Re: APL Coding Style, Phil Last
      • Re: APL Coding Style, Gosi
  • Re: APL Coding Style, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: APL Coding Style, Ibeam2000
    • Re: APL Coding Style, pineapple
      • Re: APL Coding Style, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      • Re: APL Coding Style, me
      • Re: APL Coding Style, Simon Marsden
      • Re: APL Coding Style, James J. Weinkam
      • Re: APL Coding Style, pineapple
• Altering arguments passed in?, pineapple
  • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Reinhard Karcher
    • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Ibeam2000
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, pineapple
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, kai
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Morten Kromberg
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, kai
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Ibeam2000
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, pineapple
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Dick Bowman
      • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, pineapple
  • Re: Altering arguments passed in?, Don Kelly
• APL2 in Linux, Gosi
  • Re: APL2 in Linux, David Liebtag
    • Re: APL2 in Linux, Gosi
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, kai
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Gosi
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, kai
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Gosi
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, pineapple
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, phil chastney
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Jan Karman
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Jane Sullivan
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Jan Karman
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Jane Sullivan
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Jan Karman
    • Re: APL2 in Linux, Gosi
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, David Liebtag
      • Re: APL2 in Linux, Gosi
  • Re: APL2 in Linux, Ibeam2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: APL2 in Linux, Jan Karman
• Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
  • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, James J. Weinkam
    • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Ibeam2000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Gosi
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Gosi
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, phil chastney
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Gosi
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Ellis Morgan
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, graham
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, kai
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, phil chastney
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, phil chastney
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Ellis Morgan
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Ellis Morgan
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Phil Last
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, RHui000
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Jan Karman
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Ric
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Don Kelly
      • Message not available
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, pineapple
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, Paul Houle
  • Re: Problem: code, algorithm, or both?, graham
• Two events in London, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: Two events in London, Ibeam2000
    • Re: Two events in London, Gosi
    • Re: Two events in London, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: Two events in London, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: APL Workspaces, David Liebtag
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: APL Workspaces, Phil Last
    • Message not available
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Phil Last
      • Message not available
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Mike
      • Re: APL Workspaces, bwo
      • Re: APL Workspaces, bwo
    • Message not available
      • Re: APL Workspaces, axy
  • Re: APL Workspaces, Morten Kromberg
    • Re: APL Workspaces, Phil Last
    • Re: APL Workspaces, Mike
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Morten Kromberg
      • Message not available
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Morten Kromberg
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Dick Bowman
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Phil Last
      • Message not available
      • Re: APL Workspaces, kai
      • Message not available
      • Re: APL Workspaces, Phil Last
      • Re: APL Workspaces, phil chastney
• GSE and APL-Germany Fall Meeting, Augsburg, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Simon Marsden
  • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Stephen Taylor <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Phil Last
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, microapl
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Phil Last
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Simon Marsden
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Phil Last
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Simon Marsden
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Gosi
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Phil Last
      • Re: Deciphering the idiom library?, Phil Last
• Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Vili Mäkinen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, wm
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, RHui000
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Gosi
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, wm
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, RHui000
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Bakul Shah
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Gosi
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Jane Sullivan
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Gosi
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, RHui000
      • Re: Ilmaisia kuvia, Jane Sullivan
• Re: Smarter concatenation?, Gosi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Don Kelly
  • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Don Kelly
    • Re: Smarter concatenation?, apl1984
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, pineapple
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, pineapple
    • Re: Smarter concatenation?, pineapple
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, pineapple
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Mike
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, RHui000
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, TC
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, RHui000
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Don Kelly
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, pineapple
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Gosi
      • Re: Smarter concatenation?, Don Kelly

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.lang.apl  > 2008-12