Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jeff <dont_bug_me@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:59:50 -0500
<snip>
The 'usability guru' says designers can substantially knock down font size (unless "targeting senior citizens"), zero large scale sites agree with you... but you're screaming bloody murder font-size: 100% is the *only* rational sizing for a website. It's silly.
Pragmatism comes with necessity. Bergamot can afford to hold on to his idealisms, it cost him nothing. To insist that others do... is misleading them.
This is not to say that 100% should never be used.
Jeff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- References:
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Patricia Aldoraz
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Chris F.A. Johnson
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jeff
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Kevin Scholl
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jeff
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Steve Broski
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jeff
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Bergamot
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jeff
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Bergamot
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Jeff
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Bergamot
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- From: Steve Broski
- Re: containing floating img height within a div
- Prev by Date: Re: best practice - internal vs external stylesheets
- Next by Date: Re: containing floating img height within a div
- Previous by thread: Re: containing floating img height within a div
- Next by thread: Re: containing floating img height within a div
- Index(es):