Re: Complex Menus
- From: David Morris <dlmorrisDONTSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:10:19 +0800
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Yes, my fontsize page is aimed at getting authors to not use pixels for
> sizing - instead of percent or em - because of the shortcomings of IE.
> But you did notice of course that it stresses using 100% for body{ } and
> for content text. Or didn't that sink in?
>
Ok, so what I think you are saying is that *all* web pages should be displayed with a font size of 100%, that is, 16px? I concede that people should have the option to change a page to make it larger (so that's what I did - I though you would appreciate that). But most pages that I look at with a few exceptions such as yours, w3c and few others, are generally around the font size I am displaying. I am not going to try and defend the article as I don't have that much interest, and I think it is only one approach which I happen to find interesting, but I am surprised that this seems to be such an emotional issue. Are you also saying that most web sites (such as the examples I gave in a previous post, starting with Google working on down) are doing it incorrectly? And is this the reason why this is such a touchy subject?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: Darin McGrew
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: Jonathan N. Little
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: Complex Menus
- References:
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: David Morris
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: David Morris
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: David Morris
- Re: Complex Menus
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: Complex Menus
- Prev by Date: Re: Complex Menus
- Next by Date: Re: Complex Menus
- Previous by thread: Re: Complex Menus
- Next by thread: Re: Complex Menus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading