Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: salmobytes <Sandy.Pittendrigh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:12:00 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 21, 2:49 am, Andy Dingley <ding...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.danica.com/flytier/Hans Weilenmann has a nice site where he displays the best
sharp-focus, high-detail close-up photos (of trout flies)
URL? It's not obviously Googleable (HW is evidently well known for
his work, but less so for his own site)
Hans' "large" images are only 600 pixels wide--he's trying to
accomodate everybody.
Closeup images of flies look a heck of a lot better at 700 pixels
wide.
On high resolution monitors with high-speed connections, 800 pixels
is spectacular, by comparison. Trying to serve everybody all at once
with 600 pixels wide is an annoying compromise.
Not according to w3c They currently show 54%
But because 60% of all users view from 17"
monitors at 768 pixels wide,
It's several years since that has been even approximately true.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp
That's a ghastly page. It's particularly bad on a FF window under
890px wide.
Yes indeed. I said it needed a lot of work.
My job is to implement what the "graphics artist" sends.
I had that site looking OK at high resolution, but it was (as you
said)
ghastly at low resolution. I have a long history with code in
general,
but only a few months experience with css and websites at this point.
I'll get there.
Finally:
I originally asked if anybody knew of any "major" websites that
offered mode changes, in order to service different screen
resolutions.
I got a few helpful suggestions and lots of typical usenet hostility.
I'm beginning to think the idea of "mode change" toggles on every page
is NOT
appropriate for most websites, but I STILL think it's a good idea
for sites (like Hans Wilenmann's) that are primarily image display
sites.
......if I've got a high resolution wide-screen monitor, attached to a
zippy
connection, I don't want see 600 pixel wide images as the "big" image.
Worse yet, I don't want to have to click twice to see that.
Toggling image sizes on the fly is NOT something you would do with
css.
I never said it was.
But ALSO swapping css--when making those mode changes--does make sense
to me, in certain special cases, like sites that specialize in high-
resolution, sharp-focus
images. I like to try new things. I thought I might get some helpful
suggestions
here. Actually I did. Along with the usual crap.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Andy Dingley
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- References:
- screen resolution solutions
- From: salmobytes
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: salmobytes
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: salmobytes
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Ben C
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: salmobytes
- Re: screen resolution solutions
- From: Andy Dingley
- screen resolution solutions
- Prev by Date: Re: screen resolution solutions
- Next by Date: Re: screen resolution solutions
- Previous by thread: Re: screen resolution solutions
- Next by thread: Re: screen resolution solutions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|