Re: homepagedesign
- From: Jack <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:11:04 +0100
ironcorona wrote:
Jack wrote:As you surmise, I don't know. But that doesn't matter, really, because
The possibility of producing definitions of "HTML" was never in question; hey, I could even produce one myself.
But I was showing authoritative definitions.
My point was that any definition that excludes the majority of web-pages must be (to a greater or lesser extent) "wrong", and any definition that includes them all must be (to a greater or lesser extent) a loose definition.
How do you know that the majority of web pages don't have a DTD? Is there research on the topic? If you were to look at all the pages that Google currently indexes [about 9,000,000,000] at one page per second it would take the best part of three-hundred years.
the point is made even if the number of DTD-less pages is no more than a
"significant" proportion.
Of course, I don't even know that the proportion of pages with no DTD is
"significant", for just the same reason: the number of pages I've had
the chance to inspect is small, in global terms. But are you claiming
that the proportion of pages with no DTD is _not_ significant? I don't
think so. Rather, I think you are just being tediously pedantic.
--
Jack.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: ironcorona
- Re: homepagedesign
- References:
- homepagedesign
- From: sunder360
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: VidTheKid
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: ironcorona
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: VidTheKid
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: ironcorona
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: Alan J. Flavell
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: ironcorona
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: Jack
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: ironcorona
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: Jack
- Re: homepagedesign
- From: ironcorona
- homepagedesign
- Prev by Date: Re: homepagedesign
- Next by Date: Re: homepagedesign
- Previous by thread: Re: homepagedesign
- Next by thread: Re: homepagedesign
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|