Re: DIV still overlapping
Gernot Frisch wrote:
http://www.glbasic.com/bugs.htm
I fixed the doctype and simplified it. The validator shows no error.
Don't simplify it. Use a full doctype as David said. Preferably Strict.
Then, visit this link and fix your CSS errors.
<
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&warning=2&uri=http%3A//www.glbasic.com/bugs.htm>
Please, please help.
We will help you help yourself. :-)
--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer
.
Relevant Pages
- Doctypes, validity etc.
... validity and all the usual good ... terms of a specific doctype, so these are defined against Strict. ... Documents are known to render exactly like valid Strict documents. ... the author used (particularly for invalid nestings). ... (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html) - Re: IF AND Formula Help Needed
... Thanks so much David, ... so I don't always know how to simplify. ... So, to clarify: ... returns B4 regardless of New or Update ... (microsoft.public.excel.misc) - Re: XHTML and quirksmode
... Strict or Transitional: ... Quirksmode, therefore, is an important css issue. ... Let's say you are testing with IE6. ... If you're looking at someone else's page, you could look at the doctype. ... (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets) - Re: Help -- getting 100% height on borders
... Use Strict 4.01 doctype, not the one you are using. ... the way I want them to (I'm using Firefox 1.5). ... or others will have a go at showing alternative mark up without ... (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets) - Re:
/IE problem... ... Then came a generation of browsers that switched from the old box model they were using to a standards compliant box model if and only if the doctype was strict and it had a url. ... Perhaps the xhtml, but there's no real reason to use those for plain html. ... Well, Jeff, as I understand this stuff, it is not a simple matter of the strictness of doctype but in some ways the very presence of a doctype does the triggering. ... (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets) |
|