Re: Deactivate browser's print function

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:16:37
GMT Cartoper scribed:

On Jul 28, 10:45 am, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I completely agree. In my opinion, such products aren't far short of
out- right fraud - they're making claims about capabilities which
they simply cannot deliver. Their business model is based on the fact
that most people do not realize this, and believe the claims.

Sadly, there's a sucker born every minute, so these frauds manage to
stay in business.

First off, I don't disagree that all these types of things are easy to
get around, IF YOU KNOW HOW. Being a professional software developer
I understand that it isn't a matter of if your code is stolen, but
when is it stolen.

On the other hand I think it is foolish not to put basic measures in
place to "keep the honest people honest". I am putting together my
photography studio web site and I want to at least let folks know that
I don't want them taking my images. In the end I will leave it to
their congest (how do you spell this work? I spend 10 minutes trying
to figure it out and I cannot, please enlighten this poor fool that
cannot smell!) as to go around my basic measures or not;)

Cartoper



Here's the definitive way to protect source code. Yes, it can be done.
Many an aspiring hacker has left pages like this a lesser person than he or
she was before.

http://tinyurl.com/2vwa7k

--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
.

Relevant Pages