Re: DOCTYPE declaration on intranet sites.


Andy Dingley <dingbat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
VK wrote:

Oh, for goodness sake! Do you even know what well-formedness is?

Only as an amaterish definition: all pared tags are closed properly
(have matching closing tags), do not overlap each other, and all single
tags have that slash at the end.

How do you have the brass balls to keep posting your pontificating
rubbish when you don't even understand this completely and accurately,
at your fingertips?

Get the <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-well-formed> and read it ad
nausea. The question was what do /I/ know right know about w-f, not an
official quote. Does anyone need a well-formed document - if its
properly linked DTD is properly fetshed - and ill-formed otherwise?
If not then simply su; consider I opted-out leaving you as the winner.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DOCTYPE declaration on intranet sites.
    ... all pared tags are closed properly ... (have matching closing tags), do not overlap each other, and all single ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • Process Engineering shape text
    ... I would like to move the text box in the instrument shape text. ... The tags ... overlap the graphics making them hard to read. ...
    (microsoft.public.visio.general)