Re: Basic Question
- From: Brian <usenet3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:18:13 -0800
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
(Admittedly, the <a> element is really monstrous jargon. It should
have been something like <link ref="...">...</link>. Who would
_guess_ that "a" means "anchor" and "anchor" means "link"?)
On the same idea:
Why not <list> instead of <ul>. And <list type="ordered"> instead of
<ol>. Other things I wish they had done:
<row>, not <tr>
<cell>, not <td>
<quote>, not <blockquote>, with the idea that user-agents would
automagically indent the quote if it was longer than 4 lines or so
I also rather dislike <head> since it seems to occasionally get confused
with http headers. Perhaps <meta> would have been better? Eh--maybe not
on this one.
--
Brian
remove ".invalid" to email me
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic Question
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Basic Question
- References:
- Basic Question
- From: landingone
- Re: Basic Question
- From: David Dorward
- Re: Basic Question
- From: Jukka K. Korpela
- Basic Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem applying HTML 4.01 DOM in scripting
- Next by Date: Re: hotmail loses BASE tag
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic Question
- Next by thread: Re: Basic Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|