Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Dr John Stockton <jrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:51:52 +0000
JRS: In article <jvkqa3-8eb.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated Fri, 27 Jan
2006 22:55:11 remote, seen in news:comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,
Nick Kew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted :
>Dr John Stockton wrote:
>
>>
>> My ISP provides what I describe; mail for merlyn is not rejected
>> immediately, but only when I connect to the ISP
>
>Whoosh!
>
>What happens between you and your ISP is utterly immaterial.
>If it's waiting for you on your ISP's server, then IT HAS ALREADY
>BEEN ACCEPTED FROM THE SPAMMER.
>
>Bouncing email that has been accepted by your ISP's server puts YOU
>on the level of the spammer - because the recipient of the bounce
>(if any) is an innocent victim. And dropping it is also problematic,
>because any false positive you get will be dropped without the
>sender ever knowing. Just don't do it.
When at my ISP, it has not been accepted by the Internet host that it is
directed to.
When at my ISP, it has not reached the Internet host that it is directed
to.
When at my ISP, it is merely being held in an intermediate machine until
it can be passed on to its destination.
My ISP's mail system knows NOTHING about what left-hand parts are valid
with @merlyn.dcu .
Merlyn owns (well, leases) the whole of a dotted quad (though legitimate
stuff for www.merlyn.dcu does not reach here).
Please look back to my first post in this branch of the thread - well,
I'd better repeat the relevant part :-
<QUOTE>
>You can't. Once you are on a list, you're a gonner. You don't even
>need to publish your address anywhere, spammers will target ISPs with
>random addresses to see those that work and those that don't. Any that
>aren't bounced almost immediately must be real.
They may be considered real, but it's not always a valid assumption.
Dial-up Internet hosts cannot reject until connected.
</QUOTE>
Read carefully, and you will see that I was saying ONLY that the lack of
an immediate bounce does not necessarily mean that the address is valid.
Let X be a 15-character random alphanumeric string.
Then X at aol.com is (almost certainly) a non-deliverable address; a
spammer probing it should receive an immediate bounce.
But X at merlyn.dcu is (certainly) a non-deliverable address; a
spammer probing it will NOT receive an immediate bounce, but will
receive a bounce after I next Connect.
REMEMBER :
The point under consideration is the timing of a bounced probe, and a
probe needs to have a return address such that the spammer will see the
bounce.
The decision as to what happens to each mail sent to @merlyn.dcu is
taken here in this room, by me and my machine; we set our policy before
connecting, but that policy can only be observed from outside this room
while a connection is active.
--
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v4.00 MIME ©
Web <URL:http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html> -> Timo Salmi: Usenet Q&A.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/news-use.htm> : about usage of News.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Steven
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Alan J. Flavell
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- References:
- E-mail Scramblers
- From: Viken Karaguesian
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Viken Karaguesian
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: RobG
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Nick Kew
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Nick Kew
- E-mail Scramblers
- Prev by Date: HTML Background image
- Next by Date: Re: WYSIWYG / HTML w/ CSS-F abil's Editor needed
- Previous by thread: Re: E-mail Scramblers
- Next by thread: Re: E-mail Scramblers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|