Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Dr John Stockton <jrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:19:05 +0000
JRS: In article <k4pla3-rmc.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated Thu, 26 Jan
2006 02:35:28 remote, seen in news:comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,
Nick Kew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted :
>Dr John Stockton wrote:
>> JRS: In article <I6FBf.209$Nv4.38796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated Wed, 25
>> Jan 2006 06:43:52 remote, seen in news:comp.infosystems.www.authoring.ht
>> ml, RobG <rgqld@xxxxxxxxxxxx> posted :
>>
>>>You can't. Once you are on a list, you're a gonner. You don't even
>>>need to publish your address anywhere, spammers will target ISPs with
>>>random addresses to see those that work and those that don't. Any that
>>>aren't bounced almost immediately must be real.
>>
>>
>> They may be considered real, but it's not always a valid assumption.
>> Dial-up Internet hosts cannot reject until connected.
>>
>Not merely wrong. Your premise is dangerously wrong.
>
>Dial-up users pick up mail from their ISP's host. And mail that's on
>the ISP's host is mail that's already been accepted.
>
>If you try to reject it when you dial up, you're just spamming the
>poor sod whose address got forged.
>
>If you're a dialup user, your options are whatever your ISP provides.
My ISP provides what I describe; mail for merlyn is not rejected
immediately, but only when I connect to the ISP - or, rather, when the
ISP's SMTP soon afterwards connects to me as a result of an ISP-internal
tip-off that I've connected - and my software then sees and can reject
it.
There is at present no nick@merlyn ; mail for nick will not be accepted,
and I don't currently plan that it will be. However, you could, after I
disconnect the connection that uploads this, (a) send mail to
nick@merlyn; (b) then persuade me by non-Net means to create
nick@merlyn; (c) then, when I next connect, not get any form of
rejection, but even maybe get a reply. So mail sent to a non-existent
name can be fully received, too.
I don't collect mail by POP3, though the option is available.
What happens when mail bounces is another matter.
You have asserted that saying that a "Dial-up Internet hosts cannot
reject until connected" is wrong - I don't understand how a machine
which is not connected - is perhaps not even powered up - is perhaps in
pieces, or extinct, can possibly reject mail.
Demon itself will reject customer-type inbound mail only when addressed
to non-existent customers (fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx should be
such an address) or after it has been festering there for IIRC 30 days.
Your dial-up mail service, if you have [had] one, may well work
differently.
NOTE : I'm not attempting to distinguish between any more than these
states for an E-mail : heading towards me, fully accepted here, heading
away from me, deleted.
--
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v4.00 MIME ©
Web <URL:http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html> -> Timo Salmi: Usenet Q&A.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/news-use.htm> : about usage of News.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Nick Kew
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Alan J. Flavell
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- References:
- E-mail Scramblers
- From: Viken Karaguesian
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Viken Karaguesian
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: RobG
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: E-mail Scramblers
- From: Nick Kew
- E-mail Scramblers
- Prev by Date: Re: [XHTML] «src» attribute in most tags
- Next by Date: Re: E-mail Scramblers
- Previous by thread: Re: E-mail Scramblers
- Next by thread: Re: E-mail Scramblers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|