Re: XHTML authoring and browsers
- From: Toska <Tomijaskari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:29:10 +0200
Eric Lindsay <NOSPAmar2005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:48:44 +0200:
Is this still the right place to discuss pages written in XHTML+XML and whether browsers treat them as XML or as HTML?
I would say no because authoring html is not like authoring anything else. So any DTD that is not HTML is outside of the topic here.
I think arguing the usability of xhtml or xml is best left in some more general www-group.
Because I'm too lazy to unclutter your antispam measures in email there is short feedback for your web site: It does not render very nicely in small Opera 8.50 window. Small meaning around 560 x 400 (W x H). Especially the http://www.ericlindsay.com/airlie/index.htm was awfull.
Spam note: I hate spamming and I'm not spammer but a person who does like to communicate. I'm willing to risk my mailbox flooded with spam against not getting any sensible feedback.
-- http://www.kolumbus.fi/tomijaskari/ .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XHTML authoring and browsers
- From: Eric Lindsay
- Re: XHTML authoring and browsers
- References:
- XHTML authoring and browsers
- From: Eric Lindsay
- XHTML authoring and browsers
- Prev by Date: from aerocar 2 xhtml_1.1 example
- Next by Date: Re: OT Aerocar (Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?)
- Previous by thread: XHTML authoring and browsers
- Next by thread: Re: XHTML authoring and browsers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|