Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Gianni Rondinini <bugbarbeq@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:51:18 +0100
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:02:24 +0100, Eric B. Bednarz
<bednarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
thanks eric for your post, too.
>That is the unfortunate oversimplified view that you'll find in lots of
>so-called 'tutorials' and one of the reasons that XML on the web is a
>speedy downhill trip to desaster.
yes, it surely is. it's obvious that i miss the thing in its whole: it
can't be using <br /> or <br> the difference between html 4.01 and
xhtml 1.0: it would be a nonsense. i understand that the different
closing of some tags is a requirement for the 2 languages to be better
rendered on browsers, and this was what i was intereted into. i mean:
if browsers need me to use <br /> to be happy, it is no hassle to do
it. if i understand that xhtml 1.0 can give me some plus over html
4.01, i'm glad to use some different tags.
unfortunately, on the w3.org website i just found a 30 pages doc for
xthml 1.0, which tells almost nothing about the real language and says
quite a bit on how to make it html 4.01 compatible --at least, for
common browsers--. then i retouched my php to output different tags
and make validator happy about my new pages. that's it. full stop.
i haven't understood, indeed, what's the power of xhtml even if i
tried, but i've told myself that if to be xhtml compliant it's enough
to write plain html 4.01 + little differences, in the meanwhile i can
do it and i'll use the bigger power of xhtml when i'll need it --and
understand it--.
>parser (as the W3C valiation service uses for XHTML) that processes XML
>it means *two* delimiters, and for a real XML parser it's actually *one
>delimiter*.
ok, i copy strong and clear.
>In practical terms, you should note that you cannot use document.write
i don't use it, but thanks for the advice.
><http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon>
i'm sorry, i wasn't clear enough. i meant: would you prefer to be html
4.01 strict compliant or valid xhtml 1.0?
i'm not going to show the icons and i'm not a lover of certifications,
but if i'm able to keep my website valid i'm happier --expecially the
css validator helps me when i do little mistakes--. that's it.
regards,
--
Gianni Rondinini (30, tanti, RA)
Nikon user - Bmw driver
.... parchè mè an pòs tnì avért e scelf sèza ciapé i bajoc!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Jan Roland Eriksson
- Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- References:
- does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Gianni Rondinini
- Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Gianni Rondinini
- Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Eric B . Bednarz
- does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Prev by Date: Re: Be gentle - site critique please
- Next by Date: Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Previous by thread: Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Next by thread: Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Index(es):