Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:42:58 -0500
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:50:37 +0100 from Gianni Rondinini
<bugbarbeq@xxxxxxx>:
> i'm designing our new website and, since i want to do something that
> will last as long as possible and since i'm not in a hurry at all, i
> wanted to use the most up-to-date authoring language.
"Newer" is not always "better". Browser support for XHTML is not very
good yet -- you're better off sticking with HTML 4.01 Strict.
You are right to want it to "last as long as possible", but I think
we can be confident that browsers will support HTML 4.01 as long as
the Web exists. To say it another way, browsers will _add_ and
_improve_ support for XML and XHTML; I am sure they won't remove
support for HTML.
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/05/05/why_we_wont_help_you
.
- References:
- does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- From: Gianni Rondinini
- does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding simplest HTML page
- Next by Date: Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Previous by thread: Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Next by thread: Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
