Re: does it really exist any xhtml 2?

Philip Ronan <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...] sticking with HTML 4.01
> strict -- it's accepted by almost every browser in existence,

There's quite a lot of stuff in HTML 4.01 that isn't supported --
properly, or at all -- by any browser. What's widely accepted by *user
agents* is freestyle text/html.


--
||| hexadecimal EBB
o-o decimal 3771
--oOo--( )--oOo-- octal 7273
205 goodbye binary 111010111011
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HTML4.01 STRICT and hyperlinks with target
    ... It was actually the best reason I found/heard why target is NOT included into STRICT doctype. ... You aren't using HTML 4.01 Strict because you agree with the basic philosophy behind that doctype; ... What do you mean excactly by 'browser behaviour'? ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • Re: document type does not allow element "input" here
    ... Why are you using XHTML anyway. ... *every* browser is error correcting it to HTML. ... Why not just use HTML ... I tried to write this page in html 4.01 strict and I had some problem ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: Simple question ??
    ... A web page is basically an HTML document. ... a technology that, at the most basic level, delivers HTML to a web browser. ... Internet Explorer, for example, can display Word documents, ... file format to a browser in its native state. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Toward WYSIWYG Web Page Authoring
    ... HTML and the web browser, ... Of course, even at the time of the first GUIs for developing HTML, WYSIWYG ... The best answer has emerged in the form of XML. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Mulberry gone, now what?
    ... > browsers is about reading broken HTML. ... It's easier for a browser to be backwards ... bear on web developers ("My son at college says the page looks different ...
    (comp.mail.imap)