Re: HTML 4.01 strict / transitional vs. XHTML 1.0



Niki Kovacs wrote:

> Question: I wonder what doctype / standard to choose.

XHTML is loaded down with (mostly) subtle issues, but provides few benefits
to the vast majority. Stick with HTML. 4.01 is the latest and (really)
greatest but is also old enough to have a mature level of support among
user agents.

Transitional contains everything Strict does plus a pile of stuff that you
almost certainly shouldn't be using with with current levels of support for
CSS and JavaScript. The possible exception being the "start" attribute for
ordered lists.

So - HTML 4.01 Strict.

> Goal: sites must display correctly on any browser.

Loaded question. What is "correctly"?

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Valid HTML and hyperlinks
    ... Seems that the HTML 4.01 Strict doctype doesn't support ... the use of the "target" attribute in an anchor. ... type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. ... After speaking with an HTML guru friend of mine, he told me that "target" is ...
    (microsoft.public.frontpage.programming)
  • Re: HTML 4.01 strict / transitional vs. XHTML 1.0
    ... Stick with HTML. ... > greatest but is also old enough to have a mature level of support ... > So - HTML 4.01 Strict. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • Re: No document.body after window onload?
    ... the XHTML document is written according to XHTML 1.0, ... html to browsers that support only HTML. ... evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • somewhat comeing Ibraheem Hussein al-Jazeera
    ... I was improving to search you some of my continuing ... barbers. ... reassure on the strict pub. ... in support of a selected devil. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: HTML4.01 STRICT and hyperlinks with target
    ... NOT included into STRICT doctype. ... I can even say I think it IS a good reason. ... You aren't using HTML 4.01 Strict because you agree with the basic ... What about an abilitycheck in JavaScript, eg: ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)

Loading