Re: Tidy trimming empty tags



Stefan Weiss wrote:

The warnings are also issued for documents that are considered valid "XHTML 1.0 Strict" by the W3C Validator. If any of these empty-tag warnings were issued, Tidy recommends "XMTML 1.0 Transitional" instead.

The actual phrasing is:
Info: Doctype given is "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Transitional
That means there is some non-strict syntax used in the document somewhere (tidy wouldn't want so say where, of course). The W3C validator is much better at identifying specific problems.


--
jmm dash list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: VS 2005 XHTML Compliancy problem
    ... I would wait until the product is out of beta. ... > I'm testing Visual Studio 2005 for design of pages that are XHTML 1.1 ... > is not valid in xhtml 1.1 strict. ... > Studio's build in validator. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Anyone else noticed this issue?
    ... the correct declaration for calling an external ... I'm using Firefox 3.0 B3 and have noticed that the page is blank, despite it passing validation by the W3 validator. ... I'm learning JavaScript through a book that is using XHTML 1.0 Transitional and these are just scripts from that book. ... I changed the code to be Strict because I prefer to use it. ...
    (alt.html)
  • Anyone else noticed this issue?
    ... the correct declaration for calling an external ... I'm using Firefox 3.0 B3 and have noticed that the page is blank, despite it passing validation by the W3 validator. ... I'm learning JavaScript through a book that is using XHTML 1.0 Transitional and these are just scripts from that book. ... I changed the code to be Strict because I prefer to use it. ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: Tidy trimming empty tags
    ... "XHTML 1.0 Strict" by the W3C Validator. ... Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Transitional ... (Note that neither Tidy nor AccessValet is a validator. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)
  • problem with validated site
    ... However, while I'm by no means an expert or professional website designer, I know enough about XHTML 1.0 to know that the best way to guarantee interoperability on all, or at least most browsers, including lynx is to make sure my site complies with the w3 standards. ... So, I ran my site through the XHTML 1.0 Transitional validator, and it didn't pass, so I had it clean up my markup using Tidy. ... I'm not sure why the different paragraphs all have different fonts, when I can't even see a tag. ... Then, I can take as much time as I need to figure out the CSS code, without worrying about how well I'm using my time. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html)