Re: Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- From: Lachlan Hunt <spam.my.gspot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:37:19 GMT
dingbat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
What I really need is a CSS foreground-image property !
Using CSS3: a { content: url(image); }
Unfortunately, Opera is the only browser I know of that it works in. Gecko only supports 'content' for the ::before and ::after pseudo-elements and IE doesn't support it at all. I don't know about browsers for non-Windows systems.
-- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox .
- References:
- Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- From: dingbat
- Re: Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- From: Philip Ronan
- Re: Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- From: dingbat
- Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- Prev by Date: Re: what's wrong with this page?
- Next by Date: Re: Is € illegal or just frowned upon?
- Previous by thread: Re: Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- Next by thread: Re: Good practice ? Empty content in <a> element
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|