Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- From: Lewis Gardner <lgardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:40:19 -0500
Robert L Bass wrote:
Alternatively, you can install a splitter
type filter at the demarcation point or
anywhere else *ahead* of the phones
and the alarm. This method filters
DSL from all of the existing jacks save
one. That one jack will be unfiltered.
Cheesy ASCII drawing follows:
/--[RJ31X]--[phones]
--[STREET]--|
\--[DSL Modem]
Just to be clear, a filter needs to be before any POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) devices like alarm panels and phones. The alarm panel (via the RJ31X) needs to be before the phones.
/-[filter]-[RJ31X]-[phones]
--[STREET]--|
\--[DSL Modem]
If the alarm tech is concerned about not being first in the circuit assure him/her that a DSL modem cannot take a POTS line off hook. At least I have never seen it happen...
The last drawing on the web page below explains this sort of setup. Substitute "filter" for "DSL Splitter" and you will get the idea.
http://nassausecurity.com/rj31x.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- References:
- Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- From: Bill Stock
- Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- From: Robert L Bass
- Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- Prev by Date: Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- Next by Date: Re: PDF accessibility (was Re: N:Vision CFL's)
- Previous by thread: Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- Next by thread: Re: Channel Vision whole house DSL filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|