Re: Profiles and gamuts
- From: "Golden" <goldenlasky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Aug 2005 08:31:54 -0700
Bart van der Wolf wrote:
> You should use the narrowest gamut that still accomodates your capture
> device's output.
I'm still knew at all this but am I correct in saying that "scanner
profile" is basically my capture device's (Nikon V) output? Is that the
pure data from the scanner? When I compare that to sRGB (with sRGB as
my working space) I see virtually no difference.
If all that is correct it would suggest that Nikon V output can be
fully expressed in sRGB color space. Is that correct?
> Depending on the material you scan, the Ektaspace profile may be a
> good choice. A better choice is a profile you specifically make for
> the scanner + film-dye family in question.
I'm not a pro so that's probably going too far for me. I have a wide
variety of materials from some very old B&W film to all sorts of
negatives (local film I bought in the country I was at) to mostly
Kodachrome slides but there are some no name slides there as well.
So basically it looks like I should just stick to sRGB.
Golden
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Profiles and gamuts
- From: Johan W. Elzenga
- Re: Profiles and gamuts
- References:
- Profiles and gamuts
- From: Golden
- Re: Profiles and gamuts
- From: Bart van der Wolf
- Profiles and gamuts
- Prev by Date: Re: Ruler
- Next by Date: Why does the ruler length vary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Profiles and gamuts
- Next by thread: Re: Profiles and gamuts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|