Re: UFRaw vs GIMP
- From: Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach@xxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
Tyler Smith scripsit:
Hi,
I'm using the UFRaw plug-in to open RAW photos from my camera (Nikon
D80) in the GIMP. So far, I've just used UFRaw to tweak white balance
and do some minor editing of the levels. What I'm wondering is if
there's any reason to choose UFRaw over GIMP, or vice versa, for
functionality that is present in both programs. Is there any benefit
to correcting levels or exposure in UFRaw?
If you are using Linux try digiKam. It works very well with 16-bit
images.
m.
--
LaTeX + Vim = http://vim-latex.sourceforge.net/
Vim Universal Templates: http://vim.sf.net/script.php?script_id=1078
vim.pl - http://skawina.eu.org/mikolaj
CLEWN - http://clewn.sf.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UFRaw vs GIMP
- From: Tyler Smith
- Re: UFRaw vs GIMP
- References:
- UFRaw vs GIMP
- From: Tyler Smith
- UFRaw vs GIMP
- Prev by Date: Re: Gimp-2.4.4 : tool artefacts
- Next by Date: Re: LAB decompose ?
- Previous by thread: Re: UFRaw vs GIMP
- Next by thread: Re: UFRaw vs GIMP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|