Re: Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 21:38:35 +0100
Clifford Nelson wrote:
Is gimbal lock a hint that the definition of physical space as three dimensional instead of four dimensional is just a case of too much brevity by mathematicians?
No. Orientation space is quite definitely three-dimensional. The "shape" of this space (technically: its topology) is just not as simple as a 3D rectangular brick; just like the surface of a sphere is not quite as simple to navigate as a rectangular map.
Gimbal lock is no stranger than the fact that there's no way to go west while standing exactly at the north pole
and a method to overcome gimbal lock uses four dimensional unit quaternions.
Which means it's still three-dimensional in effect --- the "unit-length" restriction eats one of the four degrees of freedom in a quaternion.
But that's only *one* alternative method. The other one uses rotation matrices.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- From: Clifford Nelson
- Re: Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- References:
- Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- From: Clifford Nelson
- Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- Prev by Date: Re: inverse squared law (lighting)
- Next by Date: Re: Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- Previous by thread: Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- Next by thread: Re: Where is it? In 3D or 4D?
- Index(es):