Re: Averaging quaternions
- From: Jason Grant <junk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:36:54 +1000
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:37:06 -0700, hoffmann wrote:
of moveable targets with unknown positions, it's IMO highly
recommended to interpret the camera orientation (and position
and camera constant) by immediately understandable coordinates:
Euler angles.
From what I've observed since taking up photogrammetry six months ago, therelative merits of quaternions versus matrices, euler angles, etc., seems
to be subject to perpetual discussion. I suppose it's just a reflection
of folk coming up to speed.
The article below is a good read. Chapter 4 is devoted to comparing the
utility of Matrices, Euler Angles, and Quaternions.
J.
author = "Erik Dam and Martin Koch and Martin Lillholm",
title = "Quaternions, Interpolation and Animation",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/dam98quaternions.html"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Averaging quaternions
- From: hoffmann
- Re: Averaging quaternions
- References:
- Averaging quaternions
- From: Jason Grant
- Re: Averaging quaternions
- From: Jason Grant
- Re: Averaging quaternions
- From: hoffmann
- Averaging quaternions
- Prev by Date: Re: WM3 GeneralEllipse2D
- Next by Date: Re: WM3 GeneralEllipse2D
- Previous by thread: Re: Averaging quaternions
- Next by thread: Re: Averaging quaternions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|