Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 From: illywhacker <illywacker@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:11:48 0700 (PDT)
On Mar 29, 5:54 pm, Clay <c...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 27, 9:52 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There was a need for quick and dirty approximation of the magnitude of
the 3dimensional vector (x,y,z). This is what worked best:
Let x = max(x,y,z)
Then magnitude ~ x + 0.25*(y+z)
Accuracy ~ 13%
Interestingly, this provides for better accuracy then the sequential use
of the two 2d approximations (see Lyons's "Root of all evils").
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultanthttp://www.abvolt.com
Hey Vlad,
I wrote some Monte Carlo test code and I get:
r = 0.90 x + 0.38 (y+z) with avg err=0 and standard deviation
(relative length) of 0.029
where x is the max of the absolute values of x,y,z and y+z is the sum
of the remaining two absolute values.
These coefs are close to minimizing the variance of the relative
error.
You are using the uniform distribution on the unit sphere, are you?
illywhacker;
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 From: Clay
 Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 References:
 Magnitude of a 3d vector
 From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
 Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 From: Clay
 Magnitude of a 3d vector
 Prev by Date: Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 Next by Date: Re: Time scale modification?
 Previous by thread: Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 Next by thread: Re: Magnitude of a 3d vector
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
