Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- From: spope33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Pope)
- Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
axlq <axlq@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And getting back to my original question, is it pointless to search
for a secure DSP that fits my needs?
It's not pointless. But I'd go for a low-volume, full-custom ASIC
with the algorithms in an implant ROM (to thrwart microscopic
examination) and enough heavy-duty potting material applied to the
chip that it would be difficult to deprocess it and E-beam it.
If you instead use a standard DSP chip, even with security measures the
adversary already has an idea of how to penetrate it
Steve
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- References:
- Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- From: Al Clark
- Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- From: Steve Pope
- Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- From: axlq
- Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- Prev by Date: Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation of Energy
- Previous by thread: Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- Next by thread: Re: Snoop-proof DSP: possible?
- Index(es):