Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- From: Rich Webb <bbew.ar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:57:00 -0500
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:13 -0600, "arvkr" <krarvind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Normally this is done by backing up the inertial measurements with GPS or
other radiolocation measurements -- what's holding you back from that?
--
http://www.wescottdesign.com
For the project i am working neither can i use GPS nor i have other
measurements, the challenge is to find out if a Dead Reckoning system with
accelerometer, compass and gyro will be good enough to estimate the
position somewhat accurately ( equal to GPS or slightly less accurate, if
its more accurate even better).
North, east, and down are easy (for an arbitrary definition of "easy");
so is latitude. Find the local compass declination and that should
suggest a longitude. Only a few more measurements would be needed to
resolve any remaining ambiguity. Making a real system that's capable of
doing this would be ... challenging.
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- References:
- Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- From: arvkr
- Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- From: arvkr
- Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- Prev by Date: Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
- Next by Date: Re: Interpolation matrix
- Previous by thread: Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- Next by thread: Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|