comp.dsp

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Synth Programming
  • From: magnus . moraberg
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: gobruins
• Re: Even order of Hilbert Filter
  • From: clay
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: gobruins
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: John
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: gobruins
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: John
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: gobruins
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: gobruins
• Re: Probability of correct detection for BPSK
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Noise figure measurement
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Noise figure measurement
  • From: gobruins
• Re: how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: Even order of Hilbert Filter
  • From: clay
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• about implementing redundant discrete wavelet transform
  • From: vandu
• Even order of Hilbert Filter
  • From: xie.qiang
• Portable USA PU-15WB Bluetooth 15-Inch Digital Frame
  • From: BEST SHOPPING DEALS
• Re: Probability of correct detection for BPSK
  • From: Ubaid Abdullah
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: job option
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: SC-FDE: On Cyclic Prefix & Pulse Shaping
  • From: Ubaid Abdullah
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Mario Azcueta
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Pavel Savygin
• Probability of correct detection for BPSK
  • From: joydeepdam
• Re: SC-FDE: On Cyclic Prefix & Pulse Shaping
  • From: ckiancho
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• Re: SC-FDE: On Cyclic Prefix & Pulse Shaping
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: SC-FDE: On Cyclic Prefix & Pulse Shaping
  • From: Ubaid Abdullah
• GUCCI bags ( paypal payment )( www.315store.com )
  • From: fgfdgfdggfdg
• Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.12315store.com )
  • From: fgfdgfdggfdg
• my web store
  • From: jutawanbaru007
• true religion hoodie manufacturers directory - over 3000000 registered importers and exporters. true religion hoodie manufacturers, true religion hoodie ...(www.trade8.cc)
  • From: rabbitwood
• SC-FDE: On Cyclic Prefix & Pulse Shaping
  • From: ckiancho
• Re: Rayleigh fading channel and Zero forcing
  • From: Ubaid Abdullah
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Ken Ryan
• Re: how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Ken Ryan
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Ken Ryan
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Mario Azcueta
• Re: Help Required on an Equation
  • From: John Monro
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: power spectral density
  • From: Greg Heath
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Basic question - what does the signal e^jwt look like?
  • From: Alun
• Re: Basic question - what does the signal e^jwt look like?
  • From: ty34
• Re: Help Required on an Equation
  • From: Tim Wescott
• New Style Abercrombie and Fitch Bags - Discount
  • From: jmsmark88
• Re: Basic question - what does the signal e^jwt look like?
  • From: Alun
• Re: Impulse response of the hilbert transform
  • From: clay
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Help Required on an Equation
  • From: John Monro
• Re: Rayleigh fading channel and Zero forcing
  • From: true323
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• DCT-lms
  • From: mmoctar
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Mario Azcueta
• Re: Rayleigh fading channel and Zero forcing
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Rayleigh fading channel and Zero forcing
  • From: true323
• Impulse response of the hilbert transform
  • From: Anex
• Q on Reed-Solomon Uncorrectable Errors
  • From: Ken Ryan
• Re: power spectral density
  • From: ayodei
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: steveu
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Help Required on an Equation
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: rickman
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• cheap wholesale brand shoes nike air jordan jordan fusion puma prada
  • From: 'use_real_email'
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: power spectral density
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: John Monro
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: steveu
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Help Required on an Equation
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Help Required on an Equation
  • From: Anand P. Paralkar
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: alberto.fuggetta
• Re: power spectral density
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Chamberlin state variable filter transfer function
  • From: kimtherkelsen@xxxxxxxxx
• power spectral density
  • From: ayodei
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: rickman
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• spam
  • From: rickman
• Re: Random Phase Walk
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: jeffstout
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: alberto.fuggetta
• Re: how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: chrisdekoh
• Re: Chamberlin state variable filter transfer function
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Random Phase Walk
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: alberto.fuggetta
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: John Monro
• Chamberlin state variable filter transfer function
  • From: kimtherkelsen@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: rickman
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: what is the z-transform of sinc function?
  • From: Mario Azcueta
• Multichannel receiver (SDR based)
  • From: alberto.fuggetta
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: bellda2005
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: clay
• Re: how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: jalv1039
• Re: DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: jalv1039
• Re: DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: jalv1039
• New Style True Religion Men's Jeans - discount
  • From: amamark858
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Steve Pope
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Time scheduler
  • From: John
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Time scheduler
  • From: N.N
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: Ben Bradley
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: John Monro
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: dbd
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: dbd
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: John Monro
• Re: Time scheduler
  • From: Les Cargill
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: John
• Re: Time scheduler
  • From: John
• Time scheduler
  • From: N.N
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Gear shifting for adaptive filters
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Gear shifting for adaptive filters
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: noodle22
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Les Cargill
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: spamkiller1960
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Jeff Cunningham
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: xsong
• Re: DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Cross-corelation between complex baseband signals
  • From: cyclotron
• DSPF_sp_biquad.asm
  • From: jalv1039
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: Joerg
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: John
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: nino
• how do you calculate index of output for mixed radix DIF FFT?
  • From: chrisdekoh
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: Joerg
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: RF transmission from a mine
  • From: Rich Webb
• RF transmission from a mine
  • From: John
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: julius
• Audio Engineer Interviews
  • From: Andor
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: rickman
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Alun
• Re: Why use such a window?
  • From: SG
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Heinrich Wolf muell
• Re: Why use such a window?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Richard Dobson
• EbN0 and SNR
  • From: m
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: steveu
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Software Spectrum Analyzer
  • From: makolber
• Re: Why use such a window?
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Software Spectrum Analyzer
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Phil Martel
• Re: Software Spectrum Analyzer
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Muzaffer Kal
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: drohm
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Software Spectrum Analyzer
  • From: dbd
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Ben Jackson
• Re: recognize material from sound !
  • From: clay
• Re: Software Spectrum Analyzer
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Piergiorgio Sartor
• recognize material from sound !
  • From: nino
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Thomas O'Brien
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Stefan Reuther
• New Styles ED hardy Bikinis - Fashion
  • From: jmsmark80
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: bungalow_steve@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: bungalow_steve@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: noodle22
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Software Spectrum Analyzer
  • From: Maurizio
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: noodle22
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: clay
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: makolber
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Re: Generating "Orthogonal" Sequences from a PN sequence
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Generating "Orthogonal" Sequences from a PN sequence
  • From: suterr
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Why use such a window?
  • From: dbd
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: bungalow_steve@xxxxxxxxx
• Why use such a window?
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: steveu
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: Sebastian Doht
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: dbd
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: sasuke
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Is DSP a good field to have a career in?
  • From: noodle22
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: makolber
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: John Monro
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: Andor
• Re: Baseband Costas Loop
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Variance of Gaussian Noise
  • From: sasuke
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Stefan Reuther
• Re: Where can I find an FM sample file?
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Gear shifting for adaptive filters
  • From: cpshah99
• Where can I find an FM sample file?
  • From: ruben.laguna@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: sparafucile17
• Re: First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: jim
• Re: How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: sparafucile17
• Re: BER and EbN0 calculation
  • From: m
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: Rune Allnor
• xilinx system generator fatal internal error
  • From: prasanthi . m
• Re: BER and EbN0 calculation
  • From: julius
• Re: How to design a matched filter?
  • From: julius
• Re: How to design a matched filter?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: How to design a matched filter?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: BER and EbN0 calculation
  • From: m
• Re: BER and EbN0 calculation
  • From: julius
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: How to design a matched filter?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• How to design a matched filter?
  • From: vimmi
• Re: Knowledge help: How to create own filter if I know frequency response?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• BER and EbN0 calculation
  • From: m
• Re: First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: Alun
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: daniao
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: SG
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Filter Shaping and Control
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Filter Shaping and Control
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: AC coefficients
  • From: kennheinrich
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: londonman13
• Re: Baseband Costas Loop
  • From: kennheinrich
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: clay
• AC coefficients
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: spamkiller1960
• Filter Shaping and Control
  • From: Suet
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: Vorticity
• Baseband Costas Loop
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: staplep
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: SG
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: julius
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: clay
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Writing low level DSP code in C++ in lieu of C
  • From: jjlindula@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: John Monro
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: about antenna gain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• about antenna gain
  • From: daniao
• Re: Integral derivation ...
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: sparafucile17
• Re: How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: SG
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: Rune Allnor
• How to derive Frequency Response using only time-domain input/output samples
  • From: sparafucile17
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: julius
• Integral derivation ...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: Andor
• AR:Autoregressive model.
  • From: latsou
• Audio Engineer Interview Questions
  • From: londonman13
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: the spectrum of white noise
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: clay
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: the spectrum of white noise
  • From: Rune Allnor
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: the spectrum of white noise
  • From: Rick Lyons
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: SG
• Re: Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Error in "manual" inverse DFT
  • From: Rick Lyons
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Rick Lyons
• White Noise Level in OFDM & SNR Definition
  • From: PhyLyrDude
• Re: Knowledge help: How to create own filter if I know frequency response?
  • From: fittipaldi
• Re: the spectrum of white noise
  • From: julius
• Communicate system organization ideas to 'laymen'?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Knowledge help: How to create own filter if I know frequency response?
  • From: SG
• Knowledge help: How to create own filter if I know frequency response?
  • From: fittipaldi
• Sliding Pulse Repitition Interval
  • From: umair039
• Re: 802.11a preamble short training symbol (STS) question
  • From: countermx
• Re: Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: mike2108
• Re: the spectrum of white noise
  • From: SG
• Re: the spectrum of white noise
  • From: dbd
• the spectrum of white noise
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: oversubtraction corner frequency
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: Fred Marshall
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: 802.11a preamble short training symbol (STS) question
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: 802.11a preamble short training symbol (STS) question
  • From: countermx
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: oversubtraction corner frequency
  • From: dbd
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• oversubtraction corner frequency
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: Error in "manual" inverse DFT
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey and Forney Algorithm
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey and Forney Algorithm
  • From: Symon
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: jim
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: staplep
• Re: 802.11a preamble short training symbol (STS) question
  • From: julius
• Re: Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: mike2108
• Re: Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Parks-McClellan FIR Filter
  • From: mike2108
• SPAM
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: dbd
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• Re: the pipeline of C64x+
  • From: Nils
• Re: the pipeline of C64x+
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: the pipeline of C64x+
  • From: joggingsong
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: the pipeline of C64x+
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: Adaptive noise cancellation
  • From: Alois Huber
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: steveu
• the pipeline of C64x+
  • From: joggingsong
• Re: Solving a linear set of unknown Vectors
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: Error in "manual" inverse DFT
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: drohm
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: dbd
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: dbd
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: staplep
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Math ...
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Robert Adams
• Error in "manual" inverse DFT
  • From: alex65111
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Erik de Castro Lopo
• Re: FIR Design Methods
  • From: mike2108
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: cfy30
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Math ...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Adaptive noise cancellation
  • From: derif
• 802.11a preamble short training symbol (STS) question
  • From: countermx
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: John
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Isn't Fig. 6.32(b) misleading in "Understanding DSP"?
  • From: Rick Lyons
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: SG
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: group delay of FIR filter
  • From: Jerry Avins
• group delay of FIR filter
  • From: cfy30
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Math ...
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Reed-Solomon Error Locator Roots
  • From: gct
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Malachy Moses
• Re: Math ...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Math ...
  • From: clay
• Re: FIR Design Methods
  • From: clay
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: FIR Design Methods
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• FIR Design Methods
  • From: mike2108
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Paul Russell
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Any lazy/dirty FFT technique available?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Math ...
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: how to realise this type of pipeline using Acceldsp?
  • From: totohaha
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: vimmi
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Math ...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: jim
• Berlekamp-Massey and Forney Algorithm
  • From: gct
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: dbd
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: dbd
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: GCC Clarity.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• GCC Clarity.
  • From: staplep
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Berlekamp-Massey algorithm vs generator polynomial?
  • From: gct
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Ben Bradley
• First try at 2D filtering - reading/browsing suggestions
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: how to realise this type of pipeline using Acceldsp?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• Re: DSP/Communications diagrams
  • From: Fred Marshall
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: SG
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: SG
• how to realise this type of pipeline using Acceldsp?
  • From: totohaha
• Re: Deczky all-pass filter design Matlab
  • From: Pawel
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: kennheinrich
• Re: Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Z-transfrom passivity condition
  • From: Pawel
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: vimmi
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Stephan
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Chris Bore
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey in Matlab
  • From: Ben Jackson
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: steveu
• Christian Audigier Bikinis,Ed hardy Bikinis,Juicy Couture Bikinis and Abercrombie and Fitch Bikinis
  • From: dingshan08
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Frequency response of a system with rectification
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: dbd
• Re: Solving a linear set of unknown Vectors
  • From: offirio
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: steveu
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Frequency response of a system with rectification
  • From: HardySpicer
• Frequency response of a system with rectification
  • From: amirs318
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Paul Russell
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: dbd
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey in Matlab
  • From: gct
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey in Matlab
  • From: Ben Jackson
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DSP/Communications diagrams
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey in Matlab
  • From: gct
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Berlekamp-Massey in Matlab
  • From: gct
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: julius
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: dbd
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• DSP/Communications diagrams
  • From: jerothb
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: Malachy Moses
• Re: Solving a linear set of unknown Vectors
  • From: clay
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Recommendations on Floating Point DSP Eval Boards w/ Samplers
  • From: tzoom84
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: julius
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: arvkr
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Aliasing in MDCT
  • From: shuhua.zhang
• Solving a linear set of unknown Vectors
  • From: offirio
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Modulation 6 dB margin QPSK-16QAM-64QAM...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: Modulation 6 dB margin QPSK-16QAM-64QAM...
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: arvkr
• Modulation 6 dB margin QPSK-16QAM-64QAM...
  • From: Melinda
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: julius
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: vimmi
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: steveu
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Humanise
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Darol Klawetter
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Humanise
• Inversion-less Berlekamp-Massey in Matlab?
  • From: gct
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Calculate dBFS?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Calculate dBFS?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Stephan
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: julius
• Re: Calculate dBFS?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Calculate dBFS?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Calculate dBFS?
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: jim
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Negative frequency
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: binary numbersrectpuls...how???
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Calculate dBFS?
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: ECG Filter IIR vs. FIR
  • From: mike2108
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: julius
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: arvkr
• Re: ECG Filter IIR vs. FIR
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: Sebastian Doht
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: arvkr
• Re: SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: julius
• ECG Filter IIR vs. FIR
  • From: mike2108
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Kalman Filter to recover the Accelerometer Bias
  • From: arvkr
• SNR penalty due to Linear Interpolation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: julius
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: Laurent Schmalen
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Future Wireless access technologies
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: binary numbersrectpuls...how???
  • From: vimmi
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: jim
• Negative frequency
  • From: Stephan
• Re: Intuitive understanding of Poisson Summation Formula
  • From: tzoom84
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: bellda2005
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Help! Difference between Walsh and Hadamard Codes?
  • From: julius
• Re: binary numbersrectpuls...how???
  • From: julius
• Re: channel capacity of a QPSK
  • From: julius
• Re: ezDSP F2812 cable
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• channel capacity of a QPSK
  • From: renl
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: Allan Herriman
• Re: Intuitive understanding of Poisson Summation Formula
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: m26k9
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: Andor
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: steveu
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Humanise
• Re: Intuitive understanding of Poisson Summation Formula
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: vimmi
• binary numbersrectpuls...how???
  • From: vimmi
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: m26k9
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: steveu
• Re: Acronyms
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: m26k9
• FFT window question
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Can a binary signal be cyclostationary?
  • From: tzoom84
• Re: Intuitive understanding of Poisson Summation Formula
  • From: tzoom84
• Acronyms
  • From: jacksonkeating
• Re: anti-Gray mapping
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Intuitive understanding of Poisson Summation Formula
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: ezDSP F2812 cable
  • From: thales2
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: jim
• Intuitive understanding of Poisson Summation Formula
  • From: tzoom84
• anti-Gray mapping
  • From: marcohp
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Tim Wescott
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: bellda2005
• Re: Exocortex.DSP FFT implimentation? What should my result look like.
  • From: cbranje
• deconvolution in frequency domain
  • From: charanchar
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: SG
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: SG
• Re: ezDSP F2812 cable
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Richard Dobson
• Please check my article on DSP basics
  • From: Humanise
• ezDSP F2812 cable
  • From: thales2
• Re: noise power at a given freq for different sample durations
  • From: makolber
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: SG
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: Cross correlation and resolution
  • From: Dave
• Re: noise power at a given freq for different sample durations
  • From: Dave
• bytes[] to int and vice versa
  • From: jaco . versfeld
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: m26k9
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Richard Dobson
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: rickman
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: rickman
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Cross correlation and resolution
  • From: JS
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Cross correlation and resolution
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: noise power at a given freq for different sample durations
  • From: dbd
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Cross correlation and resolution
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey algorithm and dual-line architecture?
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: noise power at a given freq for different sample durations
  • From: Tim Wescott
• noise power at a given freq for different sample durations
  • From: DaveK
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: jim
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Cross correlation and resolution
  • From: JS
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: John
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: 550 Herts
  • From: clay
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Andreas Huennebeck
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Coogi,BAPE and BBC Apparels - discount
  • From: admcepeter
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey algorithm and dual-line architecture?
  • From: gct
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Berlekamp-Massey algorithm and dual-line architecture?
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• Re: Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Partial FFT... Possible?
  • From: hq9000
• precoding for MIMO
  • From: emalias
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: Andor
• Re: Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• you have the golden oppourtunities to earn more money in the morden world
  • From: priya 00
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: steveu
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: HardySpicer
• 550 Herts
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Equaling multiplication and convolution of a signal
  • From: m26k9
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: steveu
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: HardySpicer
• Berlekamp-Massey algorithm and dual-line architecture?
  • From: gct
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: you have the golden oppourtunities to earn more money in the morden world
  • From: Richard Dobson
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: you have the golden oppourtunities to earn more money in the morden world
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: kennheinrich
• Re: you have the golden oppourtunities to earn more money in the morden world
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Help with envelope detector for compressor
  • From: halfnormalled
• inverse Fourier transforem of a function.....
  • From: davidbhatt
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: 'use_real_email'
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: SG
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: SG
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Log Filters
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Help! Difference between Walsh and Hadamard Codes?
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Hendrik van der Heijden
• Improve automatically generated code
  • From: Tim Frink
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: steveu
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: alex65111
• Re: Log Filters
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: SG
• Re: Log Filters
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: prewhitening?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• prewhitening?
  • From: alex65111
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: julius
• Re: Log Filters
  • From: julius
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: Log Filters
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Log Filters
  • From: wazerface@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Measuring SNR
  • From: Ben Bradley
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: kennheinrich
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: 'use_real_email'
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: 'use_real_email'
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: 'use_real_email'
• Re: "inverse analogue FIR"
  • From: Robert Adams
• how simulator is really cycle accurate
  • From: joggingsong
• Re: Digital division scale
  • From: kennheinrich
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: R.Nicholson
• Digital division scale
  • From: 'use_real_email'
• Re: "inverse analogue FIR"
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: SG
• "inverse analogue FIR"
  • From: Jan Bruns
• Viterbi decoding of Repetition codes. Is it possible?
  • From: Communications_engineer
• Re: binary transmission
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Convolution in C# using Exocortex
  • From: HardySpicer
• binary transmission
  • From: vimmi
• Re: Measuring SNR
  • From: John
• Re: Convolution in C# using Exocortex
  • From: John
• Perfect reconstruction - help with simple example
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Superhet receiver and image frequency
  • From: maury001
• Re: finding input, given the output of a non-minimum phase system
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: finding input, given the output of a non-minimum phase system
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: finding input, given the output of a non-minimum phase system
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Superhet receiver and image frequency
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Convolution in C# using Exocortex
  • From: Andor
• Re: finding input, given the output of a non-minimum phase system
  • From: Andor
• Re: Calculating noise covariance matrix in Kalman filtering.
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Calculating noise covariance matrix in Kalman filtering.
  • From: Sebastian Doht
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Ed hardy Bikinis,Christian Audigier Bikinis,Juicy Couture Bikinis and Abercrombie and Fitch Bikinis
  • From: mingqingqimqq
• Calculating noise covariance matrix in Kalman filtering.
  • From: chammidhan
• Measuring SNR
  • From: itzme
• PICCOLO FLASH PROGRAM
  • From: gdharmraj
• finding input, given the output of a non-minimum phase system
  • From: Jitesh
• decimation filter delay
  • From: klusner
• Convolution in C# using Exocortex
  • From: MW
• Re: Isn't Fig. 6.32(b) misleading in "Understanding DSP"?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Superhet receiver and image frequency
  • From: John
• Superhet receiver and image frequency
  • From: Maurizio
• Help for nontrivial densities
  • From: HyeeWang
• Isn't Fig. 6.32(b) misleading in "Understanding DSP"?
  • From: VV
• Learn advanced VLSI design from Accel, Bangalore and get jobs in the top VLSI companies
  • From: Maven
• Re: Fixed Point Format Notation
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Matrix and autocorrelation
  • From: HardySpicer
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Solution manual to Serway and Jewett's Physics for Scientists and Engineers,7th Volume 1, By Ralph V. McGrew
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Solution manual to Serway and Jewett's Physics for Scientists and Engineers,7th Volume 1, By Ralph V. McGrew
  • From: kyo28219057
• Re: Fixed Point Format Notation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: how to generate??????
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Fixed Point Format Notation
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: Fixed Point Format Notation
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: freedreamer
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Fixed Point Format Notation
  • From: Rich Webb
• how to generate??????
  • From: vimmi
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Fixed Point Format Notation
  • From: RIH
• Re: Matrix and autocorrelation
  • From: clay
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Matrix and autocorrelation
  • From: jpchibole
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: jim
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: jim
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: jim
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: julius
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: steveu
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: steveu
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Analyst: DSPs now driving the semis industry
  • From: tariq . haddad06
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: jim
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: jim
• Re: About Whitening filter for IR UWB
  • From: Ubaid Abdullah
• Re: Analyst: DSPs now driving the semis industry
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: steveu
• conjugate symmetric & mirror image of the spectrum
  • From: rramya
• On Chip Debugging in CCS
  • From: Dileep
• About Whitening filter for IR UWB
  • From: saqib Kaleem
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Analyst: DSPs now driving the semis industry
  • From: joggingsong
• voicebox version
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: frequency selective rayleigh fading channel and adaptive DFE
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: How to introduce random phase angles into IDFFT?
  • From: tduell
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: SNR calculation
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: rramya
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Yet another Kalman fiter question
  • From: mjcoss
• Re: SNR calculation
  • From: julius
• Re: Yet another Kalman fiter question
  • From: bungalow_steve@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yet another Kalman fiter question
  • From: mjcoss
• Re: ldpc decoding - check nodes update
  • From: Matthias Alles
• Re: SNR calculation
  • From: dbd
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• ED hardy Shirts,Ed hardy Bikinis,Ed hardy shoes,Ed hardy belts - Discount
  • From: qixiaowang
• [OT] A mapping problem
  • From: Richard Owlett
• SPAM
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: How to introduce random phase angles into IDFFT?
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: reconstructing a signal
  • From: ayodei
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Can norm constrained filter be adaptive?
  • From: julius
• SNR calculation
  • From: saqib Kaleem
• Re: Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: julius
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Yet another Kalman fiter question
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: joydeepdam
• Great business free registration
  • From: Global business
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: joydeepdam
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: rramya
• Equalizer and Timing recovery
  • From: fpgaasicdesigner
• Re: Yet another Kalman fiter question
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Draft paper submission is extended (will not be extended further): MULTICONF-09
  • From: JohnEdward
• Re: Output Sequence Sample formula (M+N-1)
  • From: clay
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Yet another Kalman fiter question
  • From: mjcoss
• Re: Can norm constrained filter be adaptive?
  • From: fl
• Can norm constrained filter be adaptive?
  • From: fl
• Re: Gain in biquad cascade
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Gain in biquad cascade
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: 2D FFT window function
  • From: gobruins
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: emre
• Re: CODEC Filter Delays
  • From: rickman
• Re: calculating changed ripple
  • From: Fred Marshall
• Gain in biquad cascade
  • From: Alex81
• Re: frequency selective rayleigh fading channel and adaptive DFE
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: frequency selective rayleigh fading channel and adaptive DFE
  • From: dbd
• Re: OFDM subcarrier overlapping......
  • From: julius
• SPAM
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Neu
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Neu
• Alpha Beta Gamma filter
  • From: leo
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Neu
• Re: listenability and intelligibility
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• frequency selective rayleigh fading channel and adaptive DFE
  • From: cpshah99
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• ldpc decoding - check nodes update
  • From: edim
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: rramya
• Re: calculating changed ripple
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Output Sequence Sample formula (M+N-1)
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Autocorrelation Tutorial/notes
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Amplitude scale of samples after Fourier Transform
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• calculating changed ripple
  • From: dspcom
• Output Sequence Sample formula (M+N-1)
  • From: jpchibole
• Autocorrelation Tutorial/notes
  • From: jpchibole
• Amplitude scale of samples after Fourier Transform
  • From: vimalraj
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Rune Allnor
• OFDM subcarrier overlapping......
  • From: mashhur
• roughness and slurring
  • From: HyeeWang
• Input clock frequency change
  • From: JSreeniv
• Re: implement wavread in C
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: rramya
• Re: listenability and intelligibility
  • From: steveu
• Re: implement wavread in C
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: implement wavread in C
  • From: Randy Yates
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: implement wavread in C
  • From: Sebastian Doht
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• SPAM
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: Steven G. Johnson
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jacko
• dft : property of symmetry for real & even seq
  • From: rramya
• Re: implement wavread in C
  • From: Richard Dobson
• implement wavread in C
  • From: saptarshi.man@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Alun
• Re: implementing on dsp
  • From: YTach
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: VelociChicken
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Randy Yates
• Re: Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: pnachtwey
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: Tim Wescott
• SPAM
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: GPS INS integration software
  • From: aamr
• Laguna Beach Mens Jeans - Discount Laguna Beach Jeans
  • From: wangguizhe
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: listenability and intelligibility
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: makolber
• Re: listenability and intelligibility
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: listenability and intelligibility
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: listenability and intelligibility
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: HardySpicer
• listenability and intelligibility
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just timefrequency domain
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: implementing on dsp
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Alun
• implementing on dsp
  • From: Zeph80
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just timefrequency domain
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Richard Owlett
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Glen Herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: 2D FFT window function
  • From: dbd
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: pnachtwey
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: clay
• Re: The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: Jerry Avins
• The Fourier transform in nature not just time<>frequency domain
  • From: makolber
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: Andor
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: TrissT
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: GPS INS integration software
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: 2D FFT window function
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Phase of FFT
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Phase of FFT
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Time constant of a higer order closed loop system
  • From: joydeepdam
• Implementation of CMA algorithm in adaptive beamforming in Matlab
  • From: usha181
• GPS INS integration software
  • From: aamr
• 2D FFT window function
  • From: gobruins
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Curious Case of Type 2i HSDPA Receiver
  • From: PhyLyrDude
• Re: Phase of FFT
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Availability of TI FADT (Finger Print Authentication Development Tool)
  • From: Moazzam
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: Phase of FFT
  • From: Pat Z
• Re: Phase of FFT
  • From: Greg Berchin
• Phase of FFT
  • From: Pat Z
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: m26k9
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: xsong
• Re: OFDM or SC-FDMA
  • From: xsong
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: RON C
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: estimation
  • From: Neu
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• estimation
  • From: mmoctar
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: time domain filtering of antenna response
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: time domain filtering of antenna response
  • From: puco66
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: time domain filtering of antenna response
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: Darrell
• time domain filtering of antenna response
  • From: puco66
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: John
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: m26k9
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: freedreamer
• Re: Identifying sequential numbers
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: John
• Instantaneous Frequency with I-Q demodulation
  • From: freedreamer
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: VelociChicken
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Generate Doppler Coefficients for Jakes Model with varying sampling rates
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: m26k9
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Rafael Deliano
• Re: When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: Rune Allnor
• When the DC component is missing in DFT
  • From: m26k9
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: Andor
• Re: Pisarenko Harmonic Decomposition in matlab
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Generate Doppler Coefficients for Jakes Model with varying sampling rates
  • From: sasuke
• Identifying sequential numbers
  • From: clutchshooter
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: HyeeWang
• sell ugg boot,tshirt,handbag,nike shoe,jordan shoe,dunk shoe,puma shoe,and so on for free shipping from WWW.GO9SHOP.COM
  • From: awesamego@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OFDM or SC-FDMA
  • From: piyushkaul
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Pisarenko Harmonic Decomposition in matlab
  • From: entytse
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: RON C
• Re: Wave propagation
  • From: clay
• Re: impulse response units
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: Sebastian Doht
• Re: impulse response units
  • From: fisico30
• Re: Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: TrissT
• Re: impulse response units
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: arvkr
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Awal
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: rickman
• impulse response units
  • From: fisico30
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Awal
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Karl Molnar
• SPAM
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: VelociChicken
• Christian Louboutin Boots - Fashionable
  • From: ppxingpu
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: OFDM or SC-FDMA
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: Andor
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: OFDM or SC-FDMA
  • From: Sebastian Doht
• Re: Channel performance of OFDM over an AWGN......
  • From: julius
• Re: DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Rafael Deliano
• DTMF Detection using Goertzel
  • From: Mannai_Murali
• Re: the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: FFT symmetry
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Wave propagation
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: steveu
• Re: FFT symmetry
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: Glen Herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Wave propagation
  • From: Glen Herrmannsfeldt
• Re: FFT symmetry
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: OFDM or SC-FDMA
  • From: Tim Wescott
• OFDM or SC-FDMA
  • From: Ammankumar
• FFT symmetry
  • From: cherriegeller
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: Wave propagation
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: kevinjmcgee
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: Robert Adams
• Wave propagation
  • From: Nagaraj
• the spectrum of symmetric vector
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: pnachtwey
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: Steve Pope
• FFTW3 in-place for 2d transforms
  • From: RON C
• Re: Channel performance of OFDM over an AWGN......
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: cincydsp
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Channel performance of OFDM over an AWGN......
  • From: mashhur
• Max bits-per-symbol for MFSK?
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Awal
• Re: Oversampling and receiver
  • From: julius
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: clay
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Oversampling and receiver
  • From: Awal
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: arvkr
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: clay
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Motion Interpolation / Trajectory generation
  • From: TrissT
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: fisico30
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: fisico30
• Re: Accelerometer and Kalman Filter
  • From: arvkr
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: Ravi Srikantiah
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Steve Pope
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: clay
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: bcarmaint
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: Ravi Srikantiah
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Dave
• Re: Channel performance of OFDM over an AWGN......
  • From: cincydsp
• Channel performance of OFDM over an AWGN......
  • From: mashhur
• geld verdienen zuhause,online spielen und geld verdienen,poker online spielen ohne anmeldung,webmaster geld verdienen,gratis online poker spielen,
  • From: wrex2000900
• Re: Low latency DSP on PC question
  • From: TrissT
• Re: FEC algorithm selection
  • From: Nacho
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: dbd
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Rune Allnor
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Trolls
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• sine detection and tone detection.
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: pnachtwey
• What are all the "really efficient" filter algoritms?
  • From: Tony
• spectral excursions
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: reconstructing a signal
  • From: piyushkaul
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: Fred Marshall
• Re: CODEC Filter Delays
  • From: rickman
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Glen Herrmannsfeldt
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Interpolation matrix
  • From: cincydsp
• Interpolation matrix
  • From: Dave
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: emre
• Re: FEC algorithm selection
  • From: steveu
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: bcarmaint
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: julius
• Re: FEC algorithm selection
  • From: John
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: mfcc coefficient question
  • From: HyeeWang
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: julius
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: emre
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: FEC algorithm selection
  • From: Symon
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: bcarmaint
• Re: true meaning of bandwidth
  • From: dbd
• Re: time variant systems
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: dbd
• time variant systems
  • From: fisico30
• Re: true meaning of bandwidth
  • From: fisico30
• Re: FEC algorithm selection
  • From: julius
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: julius
• Re: reconstructing a signal
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Questions regarding polyphase filter
  • From: bcarmaint
• FEC algorithm selection
  • From: vl_
• reconstructing a signal
  • From: ayodei
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Neu
• Re: Trolls
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Neu
• Trolls
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: doubt about carrier synchronisation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: doubt regarding adding randn function to a sinusoidal signal to get noisy time domain signal
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: doubt about carrier synchronisation
  • From: julius
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: HardySpicer
• SPAM
  • From: spamkiller1960
• Re: Low latency DSP on PC question
  • From: TrissT
• Re: doubt about carrier synchronisation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: doubt about carrier synchronisation
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• hotsell: new gucci shoes for 58$ by paypal
  • From: 2009nfljerseys01@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Availability of TI FADT (Finger Print Authentication Development Tool)
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Availability of TI FADT (Finger Print Authentication Development Tool)
  • From: Moazzam
• Re: Numerical Differentiation in C++
  • From: Differentiator
• Resampling audio
  • From: Nadav
• doubt regarding adding randn function to a sinusoidal signal to get noisy time domain signal
  • From: rramya
• Re: Fractional decimation
  • From: piyushkaul
• Re: o/p for LTI system is
  • From: piyushkaul
• Re: doubt about carrier synchronisation
  • From: cpshah99
• Re: Fractional decimation
  • From: John
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Tony
• Cool mobile applications Absolutely FREE :)
  • From: leanne.eldwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• o/p for LTI system is
  • From: rramya
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: dbd
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: emre
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: xsong
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Glen Herrmannsfeldt
• Re: CODEC Filter Delays
  • From: steveu
• Re: Extracting sound amplitudesw from a wav file
  • From: Randy Yates
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: CODEC Filter Delays
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: CODEC Filter Delays
  • From: Al Clark
• Fractional decimation
  • From: tharris00
• Extracting sound amplitudesw from a wav file
  • From: fuglebergt
• CODEC Filter Delays
  • From: rickman
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Melinda
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Melinda
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: emre
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: dbd
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Melinda
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: julius
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Gordon Sande
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• SPAM
  • From: spamfreecompdsp
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Rune Allnor
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: Robert Adams
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• PSD vs. Fourier transform
  • From: m26k9
• Affliction Mens T-shirts - Discount
  • From: zhanglin099
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Melinda
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Slightly OT: Comet Lulin and Kalman Filtering and signal averaging
  • From: Rune Allnor
• pulse shaping in HF
  • From: mobi
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Andor
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: pnachtwey
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: emre
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Randy Yates
• Re: Fast Cube Root Using C33
  • From: Glen Herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Eric Jacobsen
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Tim Wescott
• Re: Slightly OT: Comet Lulin and Kalman Filtering and signal averaging
  • From: clay
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Steve Pope
• When does sampled autocorrelation = autocorrelation of sampled sequence?
  • From: Oli Charlesworth
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: Jerry Avins
• Re: Linear Phase Systems
  • From: jim
• Re: MATLAB Hamming Window-Applying Multiple Windows to one Signal
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: MATLAB Hamming Window-Applying Multiple Windows to one Signal
  • From: dbd
• Soft demmaper - LLRs calculations
  • From: Melinda
• MATLAB Hamming Window-Applying Multiple Windows to one Signal
  • From: kachi
• Linear Phase Systems
  • From: noisysignal