Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: "emre" <eguven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:07:35 -0500
Try squaring the value of each bin. After all, a large negative peak canof
also be your desired signal, right? (If not, this information is also
value.)You might also just take the magnitude instead of the square, and see
which works better for you..
Normally you would consider the probability distribution of the noise
magnitude, and then you would set the threshold so as to fix a false-alarm
probability (hence the name CFAR - constant false alarm probability).. If
you do it this way, it should not matter whether you are using magnitude or
squared-magnitude.
Emre
.
- References:
- gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: NateS
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: rajesh
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: NateS
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: emre
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: NateS
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: emre
- gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Prev by Date: Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Next by Date: Re: Program intellectual property protection on DM648
- Previous by thread: Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Next by thread: Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|