Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: "NateS" <misc@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:11:37 -0500
ofI suppose another solution might be to take a mean or median or stddev
usesthe cepstrum and ignore peaks that did not differ by much. But again, Ishould
need to quantify "much". Also I feel like I'm just making this up. :)
This may be naive, but it seems like the magnitude of the cepstrum
be relative to the numbers use in the input signal, no?
This is exactly what I suggested above.. (Ignore the teaser in the first
paragraph. I couldn't hold back on the joke, sorry. Did anyone get it?)
CFAR-detection is used to detect peaks in a noisy environment, and it
the variance of the noise to see what is significantly larger.Estimating
the noise variance may be tricky, but there are moving average and/ororder
selection methods which work well in practice.
Emre
Heh, sorry I was being dense. I have implemented this:
1) Find a peak I'm interested in.
2) Find average of X surrounding bins, excluding the two adjacent.
3) Disregard peak if not greater than the average times 5.
This seems to work ok. The only question I have is, how many surrounding
bins should I include in the average? I have tried 10 to the whole window,
but I'm not sure what is better.
.
- References:
- gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: NateS
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: rajesh
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: NateS
- Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- From: emre
- gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Prev by Date: Re: The fine art of reading - was [Re: Human hearing instataneousdynamicrage?]
- Next by Date: Re: OFDM in flat fading
- Previous by thread: Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Next by thread: Re: gamnitude range of a cepstrum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|