Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:34:22 -0500
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jun 30, 3:16 pm, Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bo...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Greg Berchin wrote:
In the last audio EQ that I designed, the customers demanded boost/cut
symmetry in EQ filters, so I (re)defined Q accordingly.
Exactly. The similar adjustment has to be applied for the shelving
filters for tone control.
i guess i don't know what you mean, Vlad. do you mean to adjust the
value of Q (when the shelf gain changes) so as to keep the steepest
possible monotonic slope of the shelf?
otherwise, what Q adjustment are you guys referring to?
As noted by Greg, they want the boost and cut responses to be symmetrical. I.e. the cut response should look like a mirror image or the boost response. This applies to the EQ sections as well as to the tone control sections. With EQ sections, we have to adjust Q by gain, and with the shelving sections, we have to adjust the corner frequencies.
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- From: jungledmnc
- Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- References:
- Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- Prev by Date: Re: System Identification
- Next by Date: Re: Least Pth Norm Optimal Method
- Previous by thread: Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- Next by thread: Re: BiQuad frequency response for visualisation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading