Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- From: Jim Thomas <jthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:39:01 -0500
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:02 am, Jim Thomas <jtho...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:robert bristow-johnson wrote:\i've posted a reasonably good proof of it (if you can accept theHey rb-j,
Neanderthal engineering understanding of the dirac impulse function)
but it has found it's way to Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist-Shannon_sampling_theorem#Mathema...
before they kicked me out.
Since you've been black-balled at Wikipedia, have you considered
directing your efforts to Wikibooks? Though it's a sister project, it
has an independent community which is a) much smaller, and b) not so
anal. Also, they have a book or two on DSP that could benefit from
comp.dsp input.
I just took a brief look at this one, and found it... lacking.http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Digital_Signal_Processing
i just took a look, actually registered me as "Rbj" (i dunno why WP
and WB require the first letter to be capitalized). but as i look at
the history of this and similar pages (in http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Signals_and_Systems
), there appears to be an admin (Whiteknight) who has done a lot of
the text and i'm in no mood for wasting time fighting with an admin
who wrote some, hmmmm, lacking stuff.
especially if he's an admin, it doesn't matter who's right or who
knows the stuff better. it will eventually be a waste of time (the
important substantive changes that need to be made will eventually get
washed out).
so i think i'll pass on this.
r b-j
I dropped Whiteknight a note, and he says that you'd be more than welcome to alter "his" book. I asked him to leave a message on your talk page.
I have interacted with him regularly for the past two years, and he's a pretty reasonable guy. WB doesn't suffer from the crap that WP does, so I think your fears are unfounded.
--
Jim Thomas Principal Applications Engineer Bittware, Inc
jthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bittware.com (603) 226-0404 x536
If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
.
- References:
- Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- From: dr3amr2
- Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- From: Andor
- Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- From: Jim Thomas
- Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- Prev by Date: Turbo Codes
- Next by Date: Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- Previous by thread: Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- Next by thread: Re: Proving the relationships between FSCTFT and CTFTDTFT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|