Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:12:18 -0600
Rune Allnor wrote:
On 17 Feb, 13:46, "John E. Hadstate" <jh113...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Richard Owlett" <rowl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13rg6q7a1esbs64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
I was watching the usual car
commercial where the (aliased) wheels
are turning slowly backwards and
realized that sometimes negative
frequencies do exist.
Never thought of stroboscopic effects in terms of sampling
theory. Are wheels going "backwards" and stop/slow
motion effects generally really an aliasing effect or
artifact of not
meeting a Nyquist related criterion?
I slightly disagree with Rune's answer, "sort of". Assuming
your question is posed to need a Yes/No answer, I think the
answer is "absolutely".
Well, technically speaking you are right. However, sampling
and aliasing in more than one dimension is not at all trivial
to understand. It is common to use severe spatial undersampling
in seismic applications. However, because of the way the spatial
spectra combine with the time dimension, a unique 2D spectrum
can be obtained.
The movie in question is a 3D signal (time + two spatial
dimensions), so I would prefer not to get too involved with
the interpretation of the spectrum with coresponding
aliasing effects.
Rune
I'd think it would be time + 1 spatial as the effect is seen if camera is paned to keep the axle in the same position in the frame. The spatial dimension would then be the angular position of the wheel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- References:
- Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Richard Owlett
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: SteveSmith
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Eric Jacobsen
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Richard Owlett
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: John E. Hadstate
- Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- From: Rune Allnor
- Possibly unrelated questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Linear Phase via 'Phase Cloning' New Method
- Next by Date: Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- Next by thread: Re: Possibly unrelated questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|