Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: "mermeladeK" <nil.garcia@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:14:32 -0600
Hi Jerry, mn and Dale,
Maybe I wasn't clear explaining my problem, but you have made the way to
it. Hehehe. Yes, all your guesses about what was my problem are right.
Dale: yes, there is the threshold issue but it is not important for me
now. You are also right in saying that you lose time resolution if you
increase the shaping time of the filter. What is very interesting from
what you said is that nonstationary of the noise can limit the shaping
time. Could you expand the idea? Is there are any paper explaining this?
Jerry: that's right, the SNR is maximum just on the pic. You can block the
noise but that actually requires to know when it starts and that's also the
purpose of the filter... hehe. The SNR increasing with a longer length of
the filter might come as you say from the idea that the step is not
actually a step, for instance an exponential. But in this case it is a
step, I actually implement a pole-zero compensator that converts the
exponentail into a step.
Nm: right! I am implementing also a matched filter which would provide the
best SNR. But this is still independent from the idea that by increasing
the length of the filter the SNR should decrease.
On Nov 15, 7:14 pm, Jerry Avins <j...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:.
.> Jerry Avins wrote:
...
.> Whether in the end you
.> choose stay with an integrator or use a better filter, blocking the
.> filter's input until a step is detected will keep out much of the
noise.
.>
.> Jerry
While this statement is certainly true it is not of much use to the
step detector itself. You have obviously provided another example of
the classic detector optimized to minimize false alarm rate by being
turned off. This is probably no longer patentable as it was widely
known before the end of the last century. But with the patent system
you never know...
Dale B. Dalrymple
- References:
- Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: mermeladeK
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: mermeladeK
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: mermeladeK
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- From: dbd
- Optimum length for a mean filter
- Prev by Date: Re: SDRAM is too fast??
- Next by Date: Problems with the linker command file
- Previous by thread: Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- Next by thread: Re: Optimum length for a mean filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|