Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: "Ron N." <rhnlogic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:44:15 -0700
On Jul 26, 5:39 pm, Jerry Avins <j...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Navraj wrote:
The analogy you present is certainly valid, but is it not a mind
bender itself? Simple natural phenomena are often mind benders...are
they not?
It seems reasonable to me that when something is characterized by
weight per unit length* a piece of zero length has zero weight.
The concept of zero itself as part of the real number system
is mind bending enough for it to be a fairly recent invention
in terms of human history. IIRC, Zeno's paradox wasn't
mathematically refuted well until after the time of Newton
when calculus and set theory were put on more formal ground.
In terms of reality, I'd also ask how would you measure zero
length, given quantum uncertainty, and zero weight/mass given
that even a vacuum is though to have non-zero energy potential.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Mind bending. Was "Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT"
- From: Jerry Avins
- Mind bending. Was "Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT"
- References:
- Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Navraj
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: fatnbafan
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Navraj
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Navraj
- Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- From: Jerry Avins
- Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- Prev by Date: Re: what if algorithm mismatches model
- Next by Date: Mind bending. Was "Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT"
- Previous by thread: Re: Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT
- Next by thread: Mind bending. Was "Power Spectrum from Autocorrelation vs. FFT"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading