Re: BIBO stability
- From: Tim Wescott <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 11:56:12 -0700
nisky wrote:
Hi all,Why do you say that the ideal low-pass filters are not BIBO stable? The impulse response you give has a finite amount of energy in it, and it goes to zero over time -- that says "BIBO stable" to me.
well, i struggled with this one for a while:
is h(t)=2*sin(wt)*cos(Wt)/(pi*t) an impulse responce of a BIBO stable
system? How can I prove it?
I had several directions, but all of them lead me close but not close
enough
One direction is:
h(t)=2(sinc((w+W)t)+sinc((w-W)t)) so I can think of it as a connection in
parralel of two ideal low-pass filters, which are both not BIBO stable,
but this does not insure that the whole system is unstable
For the case where w=W it is a simple lawpass filter, which is not Bibo
stable...
I tryed to prove absolute integrability (or non-integrability), but so far
without success...
Thanks for the help
Ilana
--
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/
Do you need to implement control loops in software?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BIBO stability
- From: Peter K.
- Re: BIBO stability
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: US Immigration Legislation
- Next by Date: Re: OT: US Immigration Legislation
- Previous by thread: Re: BIBO stability
- Next by thread: Re: BIBO stability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|