Re: Papers are better with code: ICASSP session

My point is, if you require supplying the code, you also need to
require people to supply a copy of any data that is processed by the
code for the paper.

Dirk,

I agree that data sharing is also part of reproducible research. The
papers in the special session share this view, and I should have made
that more clear in my post. (My description of Prof. Kovacevic's
proposals as being only about 'changing reviewing standards' was also
incomplete. Her full paper is publicly available for those who want
the details.)

Because of the intellectual property issues that many authors face, I
do not think that the Signal Processing Society should require that
every paper share all code and data. I do think that it's practical
and desirable for there to be much more sharing than there is today.

Regards,
David

.