Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: cincydsp@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Apr 2007 17:38:40 -0700
On Apr 26, 3:51 pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
senthil_lsk wrote:
I see that all are asking why DCT is better than FFT or DFT.
Where FFT is prepered than DCT? Why ? Is it only for phase information?
The difference is boundary conditions. FFT (or DFT) has periodic
boundary conditions. DST has f(0)=f(L)=0, DCT has f'(0)=f'(L)=0.
For image processing the DCT boundary conditions are less noticeable.
(There is an explanation in Numerical Recipes, among others.)
-- glen
I've read that the DCT is preferable for data compression applications
because it has good energy-compaction properties; that is, when
applying the DCT to a signal, a higher ratio of the energy is
concentrated in a small number of coefficients relative to the DFT or
other similar transforms. Therefore, it's possible to throw away more
frequency bins at the DCT output, resulting in better compression. I'm
not sure if this is something that is mathematically proven, or if
it's just an empirical observation.
Jason
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: Marc Reinig
- Re: FFT VS DCT
- References:
- FFT VS DCT
- From: senthil_lsk
- Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- FFT VS DCT
- Prev by Date: Re: Transfer Function of Two Filters in Parallel
- Next by Date: Re: FFT VS DCT
- Previous by thread: Re: FFT VS DCT
- Next by thread: Re: FFT VS DCT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading