Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: Eric Jacobsen <eric.jacobsen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:40:24 -0700
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:51:25 -0800, glen herrmannsfeldt
<gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
senthil_lsk wrote:
I see that all are asking why DCT is better than FFT or DFT.
Where FFT is prepered than DCT? Why ? Is it only for phase information?
The difference is boundary conditions. FFT (or DFT) has periodic
boundary conditions. DST has f(0)=f(L)=0, DCT has f'(0)=f'(L)=0.
For image processing the DCT boundary conditions are less noticeable.
(There is an explanation in Numerical Recipes, among others.)
-- glen
And then there's the Hartley transform, which uses cas(x)= sin(x) +
cos(x) as the basis function. The DHT has some interesting
properties of its own and is real-input real-output like the DST and
DCT.
7r4n5f0rm5 R fun!
Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms
Abineau Communications
http://www.ericjacobsen.org
.
- References:
- FFT VS DCT
- From: senthil_lsk
- Re: FFT VS DCT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- FFT VS DCT
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Ring tones and all that
- Next by Date: Re: Very large FFT
- Previous by thread: Re: FFT VS DCT
- Next by thread: Re: FFT VS DCT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading