Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: "robert bristow-johnson" <rbj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Mar 2007 10:51:15 -0700
On Mar 15, 12:13 pm, "Andor" <andor.bari...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15 Mrz., 15:51, Jerry Avins <j...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andor wrote:
Oops. I should first learn how to use Greg's method before posting.
After using it correctly, it came up with the exact but unfortunately
unstable inverse ...
Another option would be to use one of the methods for IIR design
posted in another thread ("Generating 1/f^2 and 1/f^3 noise"). Or to
reflect the unstable pole about the unit circle. This should give
exact magnitude but result in a phase error.
Does phase error have any significance for noise?
Why noise? The filters are supposed to be used for de-emphasis of an
analogue emphasis system. In that case, phase matters.
yeah, but if the pre-emphasis was not minimum-phase (i.e. zeros
outside the unit circle which would become nasty-ass poles outside the
unit circle in the de-emph filter), this pre-emphasis has no
realizable inverse (meaning, in my book, that it was not well
designed).
now if phase is that important (i've argued both sides of this "is
phase audible" issue, BTW), then, if you're willing to put up with
some throughput delay, a decent approximation to the inverse filter
can be done with an FIR using any of these FIR design methods (and
that trick in the dspguru tricks page about using PM to design for
magnitude *and* phase).
otherwise (if the phase relationship between frequencies is *not* all
that critical), just reflect the nasty poles into the interior of the
unit circle.
dunno if i can add anything else.
r b-j
.
- References:
- Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: jtp_1960
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: Martin Eisenberg
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: jtp_1960
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: Martin Eisenberg
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: jtp_1960
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: Andor
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: Andor
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- From: Andor
- Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- Prev by Date: Re: Audio Effect Implementation: The Phase Shift
- Next by Date: Re: wavread function in MATLAB.
- Previous by thread: Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- Next by thread: Re: Lost with direct-form filter equations (inverting)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|